2007
DOI: 10.3133/sir20075205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precipitation and Runoff Simulations of the Carson Range and Pine Nut Mountains, and Updated Estimates of Ground-Water Inflow and the Ground-Water Budgets for Basin-Fill Aquifers of Carson Valley, Douglas County, Nevada, and Alpine County, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the MODFLOW-NWT model was calibrated for steady-state conditions (step 1); initial adjustments of aquifer properties were done with a model constructed with a uniform spatial distribution of infiltration, then was recalibrated by using spatially variable estimates of infiltration from the PRMS model output (step 2). The infiltration of water below the root zone simulated by PRMS has been used as input for MODFLOW models in various applications (Bjerklie and others, 2010;Jeton and Maurer, 2007;Lee and Risley, 2001;Steuer and Hunt, 2001;Hunt and Steuer, 2000;Vaccaro, 1992;and Ely and others, 2011). The simulated rate of infiltration below the root zone in PRMS-only can be thought of as potential recharge that will either be added to the saturated zone or be rejected by MODFLOW-NWT.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the MODFLOW-NWT model was calibrated for steady-state conditions (step 1); initial adjustments of aquifer properties were done with a model constructed with a uniform spatial distribution of infiltration, then was recalibrated by using spatially variable estimates of infiltration from the PRMS model output (step 2). The infiltration of water below the root zone simulated by PRMS has been used as input for MODFLOW models in various applications (Bjerklie and others, 2010;Jeton and Maurer, 2007;Lee and Risley, 2001;Steuer and Hunt, 2001;Hunt and Steuer, 2000;Vaccaro, 1992;and Ely and others, 2011). The simulated rate of infiltration below the root zone in PRMS-only can be thought of as potential recharge that will either be added to the saturated zone or be rejected by MODFLOW-NWT.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth report presented estimates of water-budget components for Carson Valley and presented preliminary estimates of the potential effects of changes in water use (Maurer and Berger, 2007). The fifth report used the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS; Leavesly, 1983) watershed models of the Carson Range and Pine Nut Mountains to estimate groundwater recharge and ephemeral streamflow from the mountains surrounding the valley (Jeton and Maurer, 2007). The final phase of work included a refinement of the groundwater-flow model for Carson Valley.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily volumes of runoff for the 12 perennial streams draining the Carson Range and Clear Creek were computed or estimated for the period 1990-2002 by Maurer and others (2004) using gage data and miscellaneous streamflow measurements. The estimated daily volumes of runoff provided information for the calibration of watershed models developed by Jeton and Maurer (2007) using the PRMS. The watershed models were based on climate data consisting of daily values of precipitation, minimum and maximum air temperature, and on land-cover and soils maps, and topography.…”
Section: Streamflow and Mountain Runoffmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimate for the Pine Nut Mountains was the unit-area rate computed for the combined area and the mean annual flow of Pine Nut and Buckeye Creeks in the Pine Nut Mountains. Jeton and Maurer (2007) used watershed models to simulate streamflow from ephemeral watersheds in Carson Valley. The simulations indicated ephemeral streamflow from the Carson Range to be about 9,900 acre-ft annually for water years 1990-2002; computed unit-area runoff from the several watersheds ranged from 5 to 13 in/yr, or from 23 to 46 percent of annual precipitation.…”
Section: Flow Of Perennial and Ephemeral Streams Tributary To Valley mentioning
confidence: 99%