2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precipitation changes, warming, and N input differentially affect microbial predators in an alpine meadow: Evidence from soil phagotrophic protists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found that the abundance of omnivorous‐carnivorous nematode was positively correlated with the abundances of bacterial‐feeding and fungal‐feeding nematodes in forests, and the abundance of fungal‐feeding nematode was positively correlated with the fungal biomass (Figure 5). Therefore, the loss of the top predatory nematodes via N enrichment could diminish their top‐down controls on bacterial‐feeding and fungal‐feeding nematodes in natural grasslands and forests, which translated to a reduction in microbial biomass (Hu et al., 2022; Thakur & Geisen, 2019). However, we found that plant biomass had positive effects on the bacterial, fungal and total microbial biomass in grasslands and forests (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found that the abundance of omnivorous‐carnivorous nematode was positively correlated with the abundances of bacterial‐feeding and fungal‐feeding nematodes in forests, and the abundance of fungal‐feeding nematode was positively correlated with the fungal biomass (Figure 5). Therefore, the loss of the top predatory nematodes via N enrichment could diminish their top‐down controls on bacterial‐feeding and fungal‐feeding nematodes in natural grasslands and forests, which translated to a reduction in microbial biomass (Hu et al., 2022; Thakur & Geisen, 2019). However, we found that plant biomass had positive effects on the bacterial, fungal and total microbial biomass in grasslands and forests (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These combined limitations would further reduce root vitality, thus suppressing the absorption of nutrients by roots (Colmer & Greenway, 2011; Kotula et al., 2015; Li et al., 2019; Weih & Karlsson, 2001). In this context, some manipulated experiments have also demonstrated that increased precipitation has no significant effects on soil nutrient availability and community biomass in alpine meadows of the Tibetan Plateau (Hu et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2017, 2019). By contrast, increased temperature significantly enhances plant community biomass and leaf nutrient concentrations in the meadows of the Tibetan Plateau, indicating an increase in soil nutrient availability by elevated temperature (Wei et al., 2023; Zhou, Li, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These GCDs include climate change‐related factors (e.g., rising soil temperatures, droughts; Hu et al, 2022; Mueller et al, 2016; Thakur et al, 2019), land use change (e.g., fertilization and mechanical soil disturbance; Hu et al, 2022; Yeates et al, 1993) and environmental pollution (i.e., agrochemicals, microplastics, antibiotics; Kim et al, 2020; Vangheel et al, 2014; Zhu et al, 2021). GCDs may affect microbiome predator communities directly, as well as indirectly through bottom‐up effects caused by alterations of the microbiome (Figure 1; Hu et al, 2022; Valencia et al, 2018). Such bottom‐up effects are, for example, driven by eutrophication, which stimulates fast‐growing microorganisms, including most bacteria, more than slow‐growing microorganisms, including most fungi (de Vries et al, 2006).…”
Section: How Do Global Changes Impact Microbiome Predators?mentioning
confidence: 99%