1963
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0023:ppmicc>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precipitation Particle Measurements in Cumulus Congestus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M can be estimated from radar data using expressions of the form M = 2.6 x 10~3Z° 55 (Brown and Braham, 1963), M = 4.1 x 10~5Z 068 (Douglas, 1964) or M = 2.6 x 10" 3 Z°…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M can be estimated from radar data using expressions of the form M = 2.6 x 10~3Z° 55 (Brown and Braham, 1963), M = 4.1 x 10~5Z 068 (Douglas, 1964) or M = 2.6 x 10" 3 Z°…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also suggest that the coalescence process will be most effective in clouds of warm humid air masses. It has indeed been established that coalescence is of great importance in the tropical climates (see for example Bergeron, 1933;Byers and Hall, 1955;Braham et al, 1957;Mason, 1957;Brown and Braham, 1963). There are also many documented observations of coalescence rain from clouds in maritime polar air masses (Lewis, 1947;Singleton, 1960;Stewart, 1964;Cornford, 1967, and others).…”
Section: Coalescence Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 97%