2002
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2002)7:2(175)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precipitation Uncertainty and Raingauge Network Design within Folsom Lake Watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the two storm events started at the beginning of the day, the AMSR-E descending data were selected as the initial conditions. The downloaded data have units of g/cm 3 and these units were converted into volumetric water content to use in the GSSHA model.…”
Section: Amsr-e Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the two storm events started at the beginning of the day, the AMSR-E descending data were selected as the initial conditions. The downloaded data have units of g/cm 3 and these units were converted into volumetric water content to use in the GSSHA model.…”
Section: Amsr-e Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chintalapudi et al [4] found that a dense rain gauge network (one rain gauge for every 97 km 2 of basin area) significantly underestimated the streamflows for the June 2002 storm event over the Upper Guadalupe River Basin. Tsintikidis et al [3] also concluded that rain gauge precipitation underestimated the streamflows in Folsom Lake Watershed. However, other studies concluded that dense rain gauge networks provided superior model performance (e.g., [33]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Precipitation uncertainty due to spatiotemporal distribution strongly influences flood forecasting and warnings associated with incorrect flow simulations (Berndtsson and Niemczynowicz 1988;Morin et al 1995;Johnson et al 1999;Tsintikidis et al 2002;Younger et al 2009;Arnaud et al 2011). In particular, mountainous regions require more reliable precipitation estimation because the interaction between mountainous terrain and the atmosphere increases the variability of precipitation patterns and the precipitation amounts related to the mesoscale precipitation process (Krajewski and Georgakakos 1994;Wheater et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rationalization based on multivariate analyses was used to eliminate rain-gauge redundancy for the optimum rain-gauge network (Burn and Goulter 1991). Geostatistical frameworks have been utilized for optimal distribution of the rain-gauge monitoring network, because these can produce unbiased estimators with minimum error variance (Tsintikidis et al 2002;Barca et al 2008;Chen et al 2008;Cheng et al 2008;Chebbi et al 2011). In the geostatistical applications, Bastin et al (1984) and Kassim and Kottegoda (1991) used the iterative manner to select rain-gauge locations associated with minimum kriging variance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%