2013
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.155382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise and Heritable Genome Editing in Evolutionarily Diverse Nematodes Using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 to Engineer Insertions and Deletions

Abstract: Exploitation of custom-designed nucleases to induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) at genomic locations of choice has transformed our ability to edit genomes, regardless of their complexity. DSBs can trigger either error-prone repair pathways that induce random mutations at the break sites or precise homology-directed repair pathways that generate specific insertions or deletions guided by exogenously supplied DNA. Prior editing strategies using site-specific nucleases to modify the Caenorhabditis elegans gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
159
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
159
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial report describing the successful use of Cas9 in C. elegans demonstrated a range of editing frequencies from 0.5 to 80%, with only two targets exceeding 4% . Subsequent publications also reported variably low mutagenesis rates that required molecular screening of hundreds of animals or required the desired mutation to cause an easily detectable mutant phenotype or to be introduced in tandem with a coselection marker (Chiu et al 2013;Cho et al 2013;Dickinson et al 2013;Katic and Grosshans 2013;Lo et al 2013;Tzur et al 2013;Waaijers et al 2013;Chen et al 2014;Liu et al 2014;Paix et al 2014;Shen et al 2014;Zhao et al 2014). More recent studies greatly improved the odds of detecting a targeted mutation through the simultaneous co-conversion of a mutation in an unrelated target that causes a visible phenotype (Arribere et al 2014;Kim et al 2014;Ward 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial report describing the successful use of Cas9 in C. elegans demonstrated a range of editing frequencies from 0.5 to 80%, with only two targets exceeding 4% . Subsequent publications also reported variably low mutagenesis rates that required molecular screening of hundreds of animals or required the desired mutation to cause an easily detectable mutant phenotype or to be introduced in tandem with a coselection marker (Chiu et al 2013;Cho et al 2013;Dickinson et al 2013;Katic and Grosshans 2013;Lo et al 2013;Tzur et al 2013;Waaijers et al 2013;Chen et al 2014;Liu et al 2014;Paix et al 2014;Shen et al 2014;Zhao et al 2014). More recent studies greatly improved the odds of detecting a targeted mutation through the simultaneous co-conversion of a mutation in an unrelated target that causes a visible phenotype (Arribere et al 2014;Kim et al 2014;Ward 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the zinc finger nucleases (ZFN) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN), which have been used for genome editing [1], the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/ CRISPR-associated (Cas) system has emerged as a new powerful tool for genome modifications. It has recently been adopted for genome editing in human cell lines [2][3][4], mouse [5], zebrafish [6], C. elegans [7][8][9][10][11][12], and plants [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DSDBs can be repaired either through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), which leads to generation of random deletions, insertions, or both (InDels) [2-5, 7-9, 11, 13], or through homologous recombination (HR), which could generate specific and precise nucleotide or sequence replacements [3,5,9,10,12] when a plasmid or a single-stranded oligonucleotide (oligo) template is also present. The use of oligonucleotides as donor templates, which can be rapidly synthesized through commercial sources, to achieve Cas9-mediated knock-ins has not yet been reported in C. elegans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of multiplex genome engineering provides the ability to simultaneously introduce DNA mutations into several genomic loci (Wang et al, 2009(Wang et al, , 2012Esvelt & Wang, 2013). Further, Cas9-dependent and TALE-dependent nicking, cleavage, and mutagenesis have expanded site-directed genome engineering to diverse organisms (Miller et al, 2010;Bassett et al, 2013;Chang et al, 2013;Lo et al, 2013;Mali et al, 2013;Ran et al, 2013). Although techniques are readily available to construct or modify large genetic systems of interest, we currently cannot predict the DNA sequences that will achieve an optimal behavior, particularly when the actions of multiple proteins are responsible for a system's function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%