2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise calculation of crystallite size of nanomaterials: A review

S.A. Hassanzadeh-Tabrizi
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 203 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the size of the crystallites is not necessarily the same as the size of the nanoparticles, due to the fact that the nanostructure can be polycrystalline. In this work, the nanoparticles presented a crystallite size smaller than the particle size; in polycrystalline nanoparticles, such as those synthesized from Leucena, this occurs because their surface is composed of various tiny areas presenting a well-organized structure but each one of those areas is separated from the others by grain boundaries [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the size of the crystallites is not necessarily the same as the size of the nanoparticles, due to the fact that the nanostructure can be polycrystalline. In this work, the nanoparticles presented a crystallite size smaller than the particle size; in polycrystalline nanoparticles, such as those synthesized from Leucena, this occurs because their surface is composed of various tiny areas presenting a well-organized structure but each one of those areas is separated from the others by grain boundaries [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…2(b), are included for illustrative purposes. Key structural parameters, including dislocation density ( δ ), the number of crystallites per unit volume ( N c ), crystallite size ( D ), and lattice strain ( ε ), were determined and are presented in Table 2 using the following equations: 45,46 In this context, λ represents the X-ray wavelength, β stands for the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the diffraction peak, θ denotes the diffraction angle, and d is the film thickness. The observed trend in the crystallite size of the Cu 2 O film indicates a reduction from 28 ± 2 nm to 21 ± 1 nm as the number of plasma focus shots increases (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nickel diffraction should be around 44°, due to the broad peak appearing for the metallic nickel in the XRD analysis for 5 wt% at 35–50° which can be attributed to the nanocrystalline nature of the nickel particles. This happens when the crystallite size of a material is small, the XRD peaks become broader due to the limited number of lattice planes that contribute to the diffraction signal, which is known as the Scherrer effect [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%