2018
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5963-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise determination of $$\alpha _{S}(M_Z)$$ α S ( M Z )

Abstract: We present a comparison of the computation of energy-energy correlation in e + e − collisions in the backto-back region at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy matched with the next-to-next-to-leading order perturbative prediction to LEP, PEP, PETRA, SLC and TRIS-TAN data. With these predictions we perform an extraction of the strong coupling constant taking into account non-perturbative effects modelled with Monte Carlo event generators. The final result at NNLO+NNLL precision is α S (M Z ) = 0.11750 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of (±)-6, in which chelate formation can be excluded, experimental evidence showed that the CM reaction of the N-allyl C=C bond is disfavored because of the twocarbon-atom distance. This is in sharp contrast to our earlier findings, where hydrogen bonding preferred the transformation of the C=C bond closer to the NH group (T1, three C-atom distance from the ring nitrogen atom) [57] (Figure 2). In the present case, steric factors are most probably responsible for the selectivity of the CM reaction: the N-allylic system is sterically disfavored in view of the metallacyclobutane formation (T3) and, accordingly, the CM reaction takes place at the less hindered olefinic bond furnishing (±)-7 selectively ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of (±)-6, in which chelate formation can be excluded, experimental evidence showed that the CM reaction of the N-allyl C=C bond is disfavored because of the twocarbon-atom distance. This is in sharp contrast to our earlier findings, where hydrogen bonding preferred the transformation of the C=C bond closer to the NH group (T1, three C-atom distance from the ring nitrogen atom) [57] (Figure 2). In the present case, steric factors are most probably responsible for the selectivity of the CM reaction: the N-allylic system is sterically disfavored in view of the metallacyclobutane formation (T3) and, accordingly, the CM reaction takes place at the less hindered olefinic bond furnishing (±)-7 selectively ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In continuation, we wanted to investigate the behavior of cyclic -amino esters with the aim of extending our earlier findings on CM reactions of dialkenylated cyclic -amino esters through chemodiscrimination (Scheme 5). [57] We have found earlier that stereochemical factors (chelate ring stability), as well as partial H-bonding interactions between the amide or carbamate functions (NHR) at various distances relative to the olefin bond, are responsible for the selectivity detected in the CM reaction. Consequently, we decided to further investigate the effects of these factors in the case of two cyclopentane -amino esters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations