48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-4072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PRECISE - Development of a MEMS-based monopropellant micro Chemical Propulsion System

Abstract: PRECISE focuses on the research and development of a MEMS-based monopropellant micro Chemical Propulsion System (µCPS) for highly accurate attitude control of satellites.The availability of µCPS forms the basis for defining new mission concepts such as formation flying, advanced robotic missions and rendezvous maneuvers. These concepts require propulsion systems for precise attitude and orbit control maneuverability. Basic research will be conducted aiming at improving crucial MEMS technologies required for th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need of propulsion systems capable of thrust levels in the range of a few mN to 1 N is emerging and has also been identified by ESA. Due to this reason, the roadmap for chemical propulsion/micropropulsion [1], was defined which specifies the proposed development approach. It is emphasized that the logical way of pursuing the development of high performance (MEMS) propulsion is to gradually increase the complexity by going from cold gas to hot gas to catalytic decomposition (monopropellant) and in the long run to more advanced miniaturized bipropellant systems.…”
Section: Necessity Of Micro Chemical Propulsion Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The need of propulsion systems capable of thrust levels in the range of a few mN to 1 N is emerging and has also been identified by ESA. Due to this reason, the roadmap for chemical propulsion/micropropulsion [1], was defined which specifies the proposed development approach. It is emphasized that the logical way of pursuing the development of high performance (MEMS) propulsion is to gradually increase the complexity by going from cold gas to hot gas to catalytic decomposition (monopropellant) and in the long run to more advanced miniaturized bipropellant systems.…”
Section: Necessity Of Micro Chemical Propulsion Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PRECISE [1] (chemical mPRopulsion for an Efficient and accurate Control of Satellites for Space Exploration) aims for the advancement of research and technologies needed for the development, manufacturing and operation of Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) based monopropellant Micro Chemical Propulsion Systems (mCPS). PRECISE combines European capabilities and know-how from universities, research organisations and experienced space companies for the research and development of a μCPS for future market demands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the recent activities on micro-propulsion for CubeSats include (but are obviously not limited to) the work of NanoSpace in Sweden [14], TNO in the Netherlands [15] and ClydeSpace in the United Kingdom [16], as well as some projects funded by the European Union such as the ones presented in [17] and [18]. For what concerns micropropulsion concepts specifically based on water, the Ohio State University has worked on water PPT thrusters [19], capable of offering a much higher specific impulse than Teflon-based ones (up to more than 11,000 s) due to the lower molecular mass of water, but suffering from very low power efficiency which practically confines their use to much larger spacecraft than CubeSats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, MEMS technology integration has increased CubeSat capabilities by replacing subsystems such as the inertial measurement and thruster propulsion units, and by substituting larger and heavier components of the attitude control system such as gyroscopes and magnetorques (Steyn, 2001;Huang & Yang, 2009;DeRooij et al 2009;Shea, 2009;Moore et al 2010;Conversano & Wirz, 2011;Gauer et al 2012;Li et al 2013;Cahoy et al 2013;Quadrino, 2014;Cervone et al 2016). Figure 23 …”
Section: Cubesat-leo Mission Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%