2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2015.7351651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise eye localization with improved SDM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other experiments are conducted given the face or specific eye region. In this paper, another comparison experiment with a similar work [13] is conducted. [13] improves the basic SDM[14] by extracting SIFT features at first stage and 330 LBP at the following iterations.…”
Section: Test On Bioidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some other experiments are conducted given the face or specific eye region. In this paper, another comparison experiment with a similar work [13] is conducted. [13] improves the basic SDM[14] by extracting SIFT features at first stage and 330 LBP at the following iterations.…”
Section: Test On Bioidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al [12] propose to detect the pupil by using different Gabor kernels to convolute with the image, which highlights the eye-and-brow regions. By employing a coarse to fine strategy for robust initial-75 ization, Zhou [13] propose multi-scale nonlinearet al feature mapping based on the Supervised Decent Method (SDM) [14] for eye detection. They use 14 eye related key points to capture the contextual information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, they use a cascade of regression forests with binary pixel difference features to estimate the eye centers. Inspired by the recent success of the SDM method for facial feature alignment Zhou et al [28] propose a similar method for eye center localization. Unlike the original SDM work, their regressor is based on a combination of SIFT and LBP features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find that using HoG is especially helpful for bright eyes, where variation in appearance due to different lighting and image noise is more apparent, hurting the performance of regressors employing simple pixel difference features. Zhou et al [28], also employ advanced image features, but in contrast to them we use regression forests at each level of our cascade. Finally, while [17,21] estimate eye center positions independently, we find that due to the large amount of correlation between the two eyes it is beneficial to estimate both eyes jointly.…”
Section: Cascaded Regression Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation