2020
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2020.2994485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Landing of Autonomous Aerial Vehicles Using Vector Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2019 ; Gonçalves et al. 2020 ). Many landing solutions using planar markers change the flight behavior to use only ArUco localization when in range instead of combining information from different sources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2019 ; Gonçalves et al. 2020 ). Many landing solutions using planar markers change the flight behavior to use only ArUco localization when in range instead of combining information from different sources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a focus on the landing process, Gonçalves et al. ( 2020 ) present a control method based on vector fields for autonomous landing in a fixed platform. They use visual feedback of a marker on the target to estimate the relative distance and compute a velocity vector field to follow a path to landing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An optical-flow-based strategy is proposed in [10] to achieve the landing task of a micro air vehicle by adjusting the controller gains. In [11], another approach is presented for a quadcopter based on the velocity vector field method. While these studies only considered fixing the landing pads on flat platforms, the authors of [12] addressed a robust controller allowing a quadcopter to land on a slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial solutions, such as the DJI Mavic Pro Precision Landing, proved [89] to be inferior with a position error of 8.76 cm without heading control. On the other hand, Gonçalves et al [90] tested autonomous landing control with vector fields, using nested fiducial markers on a computer vision system, achieving a horizontal landing error of 14 cm. Wang et al [91] was capable of land on a stationary landing pad with a position error smaller than 30 cm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%