2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0021900200014066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise large deviations for sums of random variables with consistently varying tails

Abstract: Let {X k , k ≥ 1} be a sequence of independent, identically distributed nonnegative random variables with common distribution function F and finite expectation µ > 0. Under the assumption that the tail probability F (x) = 1 − F (x) is consistently varying as x tends to infinity, this paper investigates precise large deviations for both the partial sums S n and the random sums S N (t) , where N (t) is a counting process independent of the sequence {X k , k ≥ 1}. The obtained results improve some related classic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next theorem is due to A. Nagaev in the global case with regularly varying F ; see [14], Theorem 8.6.2 or Ng et al [35]. In the local regularly varying case, it goes at least back to Pinelis [37].…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The next theorem is due to A. Nagaev in the global case with regularly varying F ; see [14], Theorem 8.6.2 or Ng et al [35]. In the local regularly varying case, it goes at least back to Pinelis [37].…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…One could also mention here some further efforts aimed at extending the conditions of Theorem A that ensure the validity of (4), see e.g. [4,5].…”
Section: Now Consider the Case Whenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details on regularly varying tails and extended regularly varying tails, see Klüppelberg and Mikosch (1997) or Tang et al (2001). Recently, Ng et al (2004) considered a subclass of heavy-tailed distributions slightly larger than the ERV class, called class C. We restate their definition as follows.…”
Section: Notation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, throughout this section, we let (t) . To state our results, we will need the following assumption, which was used by Ng et al (2004), and is satisfied for many common counting processes, for example, the renewal counting process and the Cox process.…”
Section: Large Deviations For Random Sumsmentioning
confidence: 99%