2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45201-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Matter and Antimatter Tests of the Standard Model with $${\mathrm{{e}}}^{-}, {\mathrm{{e}}}^{+}, {\mathrm{{p}}}, \,\overline{\mathrm{{p}}}$$ and $$\overline{\mathrm{{H}}}$$

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anomalous magnetic moment a e is related to α through [41] a a exp e = 0.00115965218073 (28). (13) Plans for new, even more accurate, measurements are discussed in [42].…”
Section: Qed Tests and α Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anomalous magnetic moment a e is related to α through [41] a a exp e = 0.00115965218073 (28). (13) Plans for new, even more accurate, measurements are discussed in [42].…”
Section: Qed Tests and α Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can verify the scale of the effect of small-scale variations on the beam in two ways: first, with an analytic calculation, and second, by experimental data. For the former, ref (26) averages the product 〈P(I)∇ 2 E〉 over the beam cross-section, assuming a uniform beam intensity and a Heaviside-shaped P(I)=θ(I-I c ) that turns on at some critical intensity I c(26). This model, however, is too optimistic for our interferometer, as the influence of intensity noise will rise sharply when the beam intensity I(r) approaches the critical intensity at a certain radius from the center of the beam.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%