1959
DOI: 10.1007/bf01326868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision determination of energies of gamma rays in Sm152, Gd152, 154, 155, 156, Yb170, and Os188

Abstract: With the help of the bent-crystal gamma-ray diffraction spectrometer the energies of 13 gamma rays, most of them belonging to rotational levels, have been determined with high precision. Rotational parameters are presented for the nuclei of Sm 152, Gd TM, and Gd 15.. A complete level scheme is given for Gd 155.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decay scheme shown in Figure 23 An accurate comparison of the branching ratios from the 87-and 105-keV levels to the 60-keV and ground state levels using Equation 26could lead to an assignment of the spins. However, a comparison of the present measurement for these levels (91,92,93) The results of the present investigation are also compared to Nils son's predictions later in this section; this comparison agrees with the statement of Deutch et al There is considerable doubt however, that this method is sufficiently accurate to allow an accurate assignment of the spins. For example, assigning the 3/2 spin to the 105keV level would only result in a disagreement of factors of 2 and 5 between the experiment al values and the theoretical values for the 105 and 87keV levels, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With Theoretical Predictionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The decay scheme shown in Figure 23 An accurate comparison of the branching ratios from the 87-and 105-keV levels to the 60-keV and ground state levels using Equation 26could lead to an assignment of the spins. However, a comparison of the present measurement for these levels (91,92,93) The results of the present investigation are also compared to Nils son's predictions later in this section; this comparison agrees with the statement of Deutch et al There is considerable doubt however, that this method is sufficiently accurate to allow an accurate assignment of the spins. For example, assigning the 3/2 spin to the 105keV level would only result in a disagreement of factors of 2 and 5 between the experiment al values and the theoretical values for the 105 and 87keV levels, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With Theoretical Predictionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The weighted average values are presented in Table 6 Figure 32. Gd composite spectrum with computed composite spectrum and monoenergetic components ^Source: (64).…”
Section: Diffraction Crystal While the Respense Fonctions For The 93mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present X-ray intensities have been corrected for the 45-keV gamma rays and the Gd X-rays due to the conversion of the 123-keV transition. The 45-keV intensity was taken from Hatch and Boehm(64). The correction for the Gd X-rays from the conversion of the 123-keV transition was made in the following way.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%