14th Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference 1997
DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-1468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Guided Airdrop System flight test results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(19) This fact implies that at the horizontal projections of the commanded velocity vectors for segments 2 and 3 are equal and are independent of the choice of r.…”
Section: Real-time Trajectory Generationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(19) This fact implies that at the horizontal projections of the commanded velocity vectors for segments 2 and 3 are equal and are independent of the choice of r.…”
Section: Real-time Trajectory Generationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Most of them were tested in a simulation environment, some in flight test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More detailed analysis reveals that GNC systems developed by Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, [20][21][22][23][24] Georgia Tech [29][30][31] and others implement simple proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers to track the reference heading, which is assigned based on a combination of some logics and heuristic rules. For the final stage of descent to the DZ some controllers use a moth mode, others attempted to utilize a precomputed landing trajectories data base.…”
Section: -34mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So during the last decade, several GNC concepts for gliding parachute applications have been developed and published. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%