2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.04.21256012
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Health Diagnostic and Surveillance Network uses S Gene Target Failure (SGTF) combined with sequencing technologies to identify emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants

Abstract: Several genomic epidemiology tools have been developed to track the public and population health impact of SARS-CoV-2 community spread worldwide. A SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern (VOC) B.1.1.7, known as 501Y.V1, which shows increased transmissibility, has rapidly become the dominant VOC in the United States (US). Our objective was to develop an evidenced-based genomic surveillance algorithm that combines RT-PCR and sequencing technologies to identify VOCs. Deidentified data were obtained from 508,969 patients … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,11-15 While WGS has proven to be an invaluable tool for identification of new variants, the cost as well as turnaround times for sample processing and data analysis remain challenging for wide implementation. 4-6,8 This demonstrates that genotyping assays offer a fast, reliable, and cost-effective method for monitoring of known SARS-CoV-2 variants within a population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3,11-15 While WGS has proven to be an invaluable tool for identification of new variants, the cost as well as turnaround times for sample processing and data analysis remain challenging for wide implementation. 4-6,8 This demonstrates that genotyping assays offer a fast, reliable, and cost-effective method for monitoring of known SARS-CoV-2 variants within a population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A side-by-side cost analysis was performed by comparing the mutation panel genotyping approach for VOC surveillance to the WGS, with respect to cost of instrumentation, consumables, staff, computing capacity and data storage and other variables (Figure 1C). [4][5][6]8 The average cost per sample for the genotyping approach using a 12-assay mutation panel was calculated to be over 8 times lower than WGS, without factoring in the longer turn-around-time for obtaining the WGS results when compared to RT-PCR. 5,6,8…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations