2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26591-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision imaging of 4.4 MeV gamma rays using a 3-D position sensitive Compton camera

Abstract: Imaging of nuclear gamma-ray lines in the 1–10 MeV range is far from being established in both medical and physical applications. In proton therapy, 4.4 MeV gamma rays are emitted from the excited nucleus of either 12C* or 11B* and are considered good indicators of dose delivery and/or range verification. Further, in gamma-ray astronomy, 4.4 MeV gamma rays are produced by cosmic ray interactions in the interstellar medium, and can thus be used to probe nucleothynthesis in the universe. In this paper, we presen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although ToF cannot be measured in the compact configuration, back-scattering gamma rays from the absorber are avoided using the energy cut of the scatterer. Various methods to reduce background contamination have been considered, and we successfully proved these methods could exclude the background events and improve the quality of the MeV gamma-ray images 20,21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although ToF cannot be measured in the compact configuration, back-scattering gamma rays from the absorber are avoided using the energy cut of the scatterer. Various methods to reduce background contamination have been considered, and we successfully proved these methods could exclude the background events and improve the quality of the MeV gamma-ray images 20,21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In our case, we preferred not to assume that the beam is described by a perfect line given the non-negligible extension of the simulated beam and the resulting activity distribution. (e) Energy Peaks: A common approach in PGI is to select events whose total deposited energy corresponds to certain transitions of the excited nuclei within the patient, reflected as peaks in the spectrum [28], [34]. Here, we selected the most prominent energy peaks that are seen in Fig.…”
Section: Data Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are several challenges that need to be addressed for a reliable implementation of this methodology in the clinical case 17 . Indeed, in-vivo range monitoring remains still an issue for most of the Compton cameras under development 16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] . These limitations are related to the limited coincidence efficiency of some of the detectors 20,21,25 , the high counting rates in clinical conditions 16,24,30 , the spatial resolution 22 , the signal-to-background ratio that is challenged by contaminant reactions 18,31 , and the CPU processing-time required by the corresponding image-reconstruction algorithm 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%