1996
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/1996/t65/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision lifetime measurements on alkali atoms and on helium by beam–gas–laser spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
163
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
22
163
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 and 8, we plot W ν as a function of wavelength for a number of ro-vibrational levels for sodium and potassium, respectively. The corresponding radiative lifetimes are listed in Tables II and III. They do not differ much from the lifetimes of the excited atoms, 16.3 ns for Na [14,15] and 26.5 ns for K [16], into which the A 2 Π states of the molecules separate with the exception of the v = 4 level of KHe. For the v = 4 level of KHe there occurs what appears to be a chance cancellation in the integration of the dipole matrix element.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…7 and 8, we plot W ν as a function of wavelength for a number of ro-vibrational levels for sodium and potassium, respectively. The corresponding radiative lifetimes are listed in Tables II and III. They do not differ much from the lifetimes of the excited atoms, 16.3 ns for Na [14,15] and 26.5 ns for K [16], into which the A 2 Π states of the molecules separate with the exception of the v = 4 level of KHe. For the v = 4 level of KHe there occurs what appears to be a chance cancellation in the integration of the dipole matrix element.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Indeed, the experimental lifetime measurements noted τ 3/2 and τ 1/2 for np 3/2 and np 1/2 [46,67,68] disagree with the predicted ratio D 3/2 /D 1/2 = √ 2 (see formulas (53) and (54)). This relativistic correction has to be taken into account.…”
Section: B34 Relativistic Correctionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This rate is equal to half the single-photon Rabi frequency. It is to be compared with γ = 1.9 × 10 7 s −1 [17], which is half the natural decay rate of the excited atomic population and with κ, which is half the decay rate of power in the cavity. The rate κ is related to the cavity finesse F by κ = πc/(2LF ) (c is the speed of light), and hence to the reflectivities of the mirrors [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%