2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/5868570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Light for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders

Abstract: Circadian timekeeping can be reset by brief flashes of light using stimulation protocols thousands of times shorter than those previously assumed to be necessary for traditional phototherapy. These observations point to a future where flexible architectures of nanosecond-, microsecond-, and millisecond-scale light pulses are compiled to reprogram the brain's internal clock when it has been altered by psychiatric illness or advanced age. In the current review, we present a chronology of seminal experiments that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
(152 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, our results Precious few studies have attempted to distinguish how light differentially impacts phase resetting of the E and M oscillator. Those that have are in general agreement with our results that the M oscillator's responses are less energy dependent than those of the E oscillator [35,36], but have not probed much further to look at differences in how these subsystems process other characteristics of light-conceivably a massive parameter space involving syllables (i.e., intermittent bytes of photic information) with different pulse shapes and length, intensities, color enrichment, and delivery intervals [37]. Inspired by the natural asymmetries in light and color perception that occur at dawn versus dusk [53], we quantified in the current study the M oscillator's responses to over a dozen patterns of intermittent light administration at ZT23 (an hour before lights-on or "dawn") and benchmarked them against a previous study from our laboratory that evaluated the E oscillator's responses to the same protocols at ZT13 (an hour after lights-off or "dusk") [40].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In sum, our results Precious few studies have attempted to distinguish how light differentially impacts phase resetting of the E and M oscillator. Those that have are in general agreement with our results that the M oscillator's responses are less energy dependent than those of the E oscillator [35,36], but have not probed much further to look at differences in how these subsystems process other characteristics of light-conceivably a massive parameter space involving syllables (i.e., intermittent bytes of photic information) with different pulse shapes and length, intensities, color enrichment, and delivery intervals [37]. Inspired by the natural asymmetries in light and color perception that occur at dawn versus dusk [53], we quantified in the current study the M oscillator's responses to over a dozen patterns of intermittent light administration at ZT23 (an hour before lights-on or "dawn") and benchmarked them against a previous study from our laboratory that evaluated the E oscillator's responses to the same protocols at ZT13 (an hour after lights-off or "dusk") [40].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…While appreciable effort has gone into characterizing the cellular and molecular origins of the pacemaker's E and M oscillators, considerably less so has been given to defining the extent to which each subsystem differs in its responses to light (beyond phase directionality). This question, which has been woefully unaddressed over the past 30-40 years in particular [34][35][36], is newly relevant given recent studies demonstrating the inordinate phase-shifting effects of intermittent light stimulation [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. For example, when millisecond flashes are delivered once-every-second or once-every-several-seconds to flies [40,41], common laboratory rodents [42][43][44], or people [45,46], they will produce a phase jump nearly identical to that produced by nonstop illumination over the same administration period-despite the massive difference in exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The susceptibility of the circadian clock to be shifted by time-specific light exposure is thoroughly studied and is broadly utilized in treatment protocols of sleep-phase and depressive disorders, e.g., SAD (Gooley, 2008;Kaladchibachi & Fernandez, 2018;Oldham & Ciraulo, 2014). Long-term light interventions effectively advance sleep onset time (van Maanen, et al, 2016;Watanabe, Kajimura, Kato, Sekimoto, & Takahashi, 1999) as well as result in less sleepiness after awakening in neurotypical adults with DSPD (Lack, et al, 2007;Van De Werken, et al, 2010), for a review see (Figueiro, 2016).…”
Section: Light Treatment For Circadian Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, due to the lack of an obvious type of placebo treatment, LT studies have been extensively criticized for their flawed experimental design. And yet, at least for the treatment of seasonal and non-seasonal depression, an accumulated bulk of randomized and double-blind clinical trials approves the utility of LT and invites further studies in other psychiatric, neurodevelopmental and neurocognitive disorders (for review see (Kaladchibachi & Fernandez, 2018)).…”
Section: Light Treatment For Circadian Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation