2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01151-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Medicine in Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Markers to Guide Treatment and Promising Future Directions

Eric J. Miller,
Matthew D. Galsky
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Putative reasons which may contribute to affect the consistency and comparability of available findings in this setting (and more generally the assessment of PD-L1 expression as a biomarker in BC) are (1) intrinsic to the study population, including a small number of patients overall [50,58,62], an exceedingly low recurrence rate after BCG treatment, and/or unbalanced subgroup size (i.e., BCG responders vs. non responders) [53]; (2) intrinsic to the treatment, including the frequency and/or timing of BCG administration and type of BCG reagents; (3) intrinsic to the method, such as PD-L1 assessment through heterogeneous assays, antibody clones, cellular populations, scoring systems, and cut-off points (see next section); and (4) intrinsic to the tumor/tissue sample, due to the intra-tumoral heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression and the dynamic nature of the tumor microenvironment [66,67]. Furthermore, the constantly changing of the molecule over time (temporal heterogeneity) has been proven by the discrepancy over different tumor stages, as well as between metastatic sites and corresponding primary tumors, revealed by several authors [68,69].…”
Section: Prognostic Role Of Pd-l1 In Nmibc: Focus On Bcg Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putative reasons which may contribute to affect the consistency and comparability of available findings in this setting (and more generally the assessment of PD-L1 expression as a biomarker in BC) are (1) intrinsic to the study population, including a small number of patients overall [50,58,62], an exceedingly low recurrence rate after BCG treatment, and/or unbalanced subgroup size (i.e., BCG responders vs. non responders) [53]; (2) intrinsic to the treatment, including the frequency and/or timing of BCG administration and type of BCG reagents; (3) intrinsic to the method, such as PD-L1 assessment through heterogeneous assays, antibody clones, cellular populations, scoring systems, and cut-off points (see next section); and (4) intrinsic to the tumor/tissue sample, due to the intra-tumoral heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression and the dynamic nature of the tumor microenvironment [66,67]. Furthermore, the constantly changing of the molecule over time (temporal heterogeneity) has been proven by the discrepancy over different tumor stages, as well as between metastatic sites and corresponding primary tumors, revealed by several authors [68,69].…”
Section: Prognostic Role Of Pd-l1 In Nmibc: Focus On Bcg Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 - 9 In addition, we recently showed that membranous NECTIN4 expression frequently decreased during metastatic spread and correlates with EV response in patients with mUC. 10 In light of other effective treatment alternatives such as trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP2)- or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–directed ADC or fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors, a better understanding of the molecular basis for EV responses is urgently needed to improve the rational use of this effective drug for patients with mUC 11 - 15 and to optimize its ongoing clinical development in earlier UC stages and other solid tumors. 16 - 19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%