Precision of a new tool to measure visceral adipose tissue (VAT) using dual‐energy X‐Ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Abstract

Objective: A new tool to quantify visceral adipose tissue (VAT) over the android region of a total body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan has recently been reported. The measurement, CoreScan, is currently available on Lunar iDXA densitometers. The purpose of the study was to determine the precision of the CoreScan VAT measurement, which is critical for understanding the utility of this measure in longitudinal trials. Design and Methods: VAT precision was characterized in both an anthropomorphic imaging phantom (measured on 10 Lunar iDXA systems) and a clinical population consisting of obese women (n ¼ 32). Results: The intrascanner precision for the VAT phantom across 9 quantities of VAT mass (01,800 g) ranged from 28.4 to 38.0 g. The interscanner precision ranged from 24.7 to 38.4 g. There was no statistical dependence on the quantity of VAT for either the inter-or intrascanner precision result (p ¼ 0.670). Combining inter-and intrascanner precision yielded a total phantom precision estimate of 47.6 g for VAT mass, which corresponds to a 4.8% coefficient of variance (CV) for a 1 kg VAT mass. Our clinical population, who completed replicate total body scans with repositioning between scans, showed a precision of 56.8 g on an average VAT mass of 1110.4 g. This corresponds to a 5.1% CV. Hence, the in vivo precision result was similar to the phantom precision result. Conclusions: The study suggests that CoreScan has a relatively low precision error in both phantoms and obese women and therefore may be a useful addition to clinical trials where interventions are targeted towards changes in visceral adiposity.Obesity (2013) 21, E134-E136.

Association of Appendicular Lean Mass, and Subcutaneous and Visceral Adipose Tissue With Mortality in Older Brazilians: The São Paulo Ageing & Health Study

“…The lateral android subcutaneous fat is automatically set by the DXA software; it is used to estimate the anterior and posterior android subcutaneous fat. Finally, VAT results from the subtraction of the subcutaneous android fat from the total android fat; it was measured as mass (g), area (cm²), and volume (cm³ ) …”

The body composition phenotype of Irish adults aged 18–81 years

“…The precision (root mean square coefficient of variance; RMS-CV) for repeated measurement was 0.6 %. The CoreScan TM software provided a measure of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) [14,15]. Lower limit of detection for VAT was set at B0 g. Anthropometric and DXA analysis provided measures of body mass index (BMI; body mass/height 2 ), body fat mass (BFM), body fat percentage [BF %; body fat mass (BFM)/body mass], body fat mass index (BFMI; BFM/height 2 ), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), LTM, lean tissue mass index (LTMI; LTM/height 2 ), appendicular lean tissue mass (ALTM) and appendicular lean tissue mass index (ALTMI; ALTM/height 2 ).…”

Muscle Deficits in Rheumatoid Arthritis Contribute to Inferior Cortical Bone Structure and Trabecular Bone Mineral Density

“…The in vitro CV for Hologic measurement of lean mass was less than 0.6% and the in vivo CV in adults was less than 1% (33). We utilized a previously validated method to quantify visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area (34). The CV for VAT was 5.3%.…”