2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2007.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision of ingestion time and evacuation predictors for individual prey in stomachs of predatory fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates μ i of S 0.5 i,t i may however be obtained from lengths of suitable sections of the partially digested prey recovered from the sampled stomachs by use of corresponding length-mass relationships established from measurements on fresh prey. Andersen and Beyer (2008) demonstrated that the standard deviation σ m of the relative error (S 0.5 i,t i − μ i )μ −1 i (i.e. the coefficient of variation of μ i ) can be considered constant, and a generally representative value of 0.03 obtained from measurements on a variety of prey fishes, was adopted for four different lengths.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Estimates μ i of S 0.5 i,t i may however be obtained from lengths of suitable sections of the partially digested prey recovered from the sampled stomachs by use of corresponding length-mass relationships established from measurements on fresh prey. Andersen and Beyer (2008) demonstrated that the standard deviation σ m of the relative error (S 0.5 i,t i − μ i )μ −1 i (i.e. the coefficient of variation of μ i ) can be considered constant, and a generally representative value of 0.03 obtained from measurements on a variety of prey fishes, was adopted for four different lengths.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andersen and Beyer (2008) used a simple individual-based model of the predator to describe the variability of gastric evacuation not accounted for by the deterministic cylinder model. They showed that the variance of ρ i,E could be described by (σ e ρ i,E ) 2 , and obtained the estimate 0.10 of the coefficient of variation σ e from gastric evacuation experiments on Atlantic cod, whiting and saithe (pollock) (Pollachius virens) fed a variety of prey fishes.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CV value of 0.080 estimated from the voluntarily feeding fish by Andersen 14 ( Table 2) compared well with the estimate of 0.098 obtained from a variety of predatory gadoids and their fish prey. 15 This variation probably reflects the interindividual variation in gastric performance. Substantially higher values of CV were obtained from both groups of force-fed G. morhua, which may then be explained by an additional variability due to the suppressing effects of handling, anaesthetization and force-feeding on GER to which the individual fish responds differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). This provides a simple description of the variability of gastric evacuation not accounted for by the square‐root function (Andersen & Beyer, ). The rate parameter ρ is hence considered the outcome of a normally distributed stochastic variable with the variance ( σρ ) 2 , where σ is the constant c.v. of ρ .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%