Precision of low-dose CT-based micromotion analysis technique for the assessment of early acetabular cup migration compared with gold standard RSA: a prospective study of 30 patients up to 1 year

Angelomenos, Vasileios; Mohaddes, Maziar; Itayem, Raed; Shareghi, Bita

doi:10.2340/17453674.2022.2528

Cited by 10 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 43 publications

(66 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Reported precisions (when defined as 1.96 × SD) for traditional and model-based RSA in comparable acetabular cup configurations range from 0.01 to 0.29 mm for translations and from 0.05° to 0.59° for rotations. 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 Reported precisions for CT-based migration analysis techniques in acetabular cups range from 0.03 to 0.16 mm for translations and from 0.06° to 0.37° for rotations. 9 , 10 , 12 The method presented in this paper shows comparable acetabular cup precision to these methods of 0.08–0.11 mm for translations and 0.19°–0.42° for rotations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 Reported precisions for CT-based migration analysis techniques in acetabular cups range from 0.03 to 0.16 mm for translations and from 0.06° to 0.37° for rotations. 9 , 10 , 12 The method presented in this paper shows comparable acetabular cup precision to these methods of 0.08–0.11 mm for translations and 0.19°–0.42° for rotations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Computed tomography (CT) is a ubiquitous method to create high-resolution 3D images of voxels of submillimetre size. A commercial solution, computed tomography micromotion analysis (CTMA, Sectra, Linköping, Sweden) is a promising alternative to RSA which uses CT scans to determine movements between implants and bones in a similar fashion to RSA with similar accuracy and precision, 9 – 12 but is not yet available for use with all implants.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some of these studies have used tantalum beads embedded into implants 10 , 12 and others have used a model-based method to measure migration without modifying the implants. 9 , 16 – 18 One of these groups has developed an entirely markerless system 10 which has the potential to be used in routine clinical practice. In the current study, a semi-automated low dose CT spatial analysis (CTSA) method was developed for assessing migration in a monobloc ceramic hip resurfacing implant within a premarket clinical investigation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Low dose CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) to measure implant migration after ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA): A phantom study

Clarke

Logishetty

Cobb

2023

Proc Inst Mech Eng H

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implant migration is a predictor of arthroplasty survivorship. It is crucial to monitor the migration of novel hip prostheses within premarket clinical investigations. RSA is the gold standard method, but requires calibrated radiographs using specialised equipment. A commercial computed tomography micromotion analysis solution is a promising alternative but is not yet available for use with monobloc ceramic implants. This study aimed to develop and validate a CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) method for use with ceramic implants. A phantom study was undertaken to assess accuracy and precision. A ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and 20 tantalum beads were implanted into a synthetic hip model and mounted onto a 6-degree of freedom motion stage. The hip was repeatedly scanned with a low dose CT protocol, with imposed micromovements. Data were interrogated using a semiautomated technique. The effective radiation dose for each scan was estimated to be 0.25 mSv. For the head implant, precision ranged between 0.11 and 0.28 mm for translations and 0.34°–0.42° for rotations. For the cup implant, precision ranged between 0.08 and 0.11 mm and 0.19° and 0.42°. For the head, accuracy ranged between 0.04 and 0.18 mm for translations and 0.28°–0.46° for rotations. For the cup, accuracy ranged between 0.04 and 0.08 mm and 0.17° and 0.43°. This in vitro study demonstrates that low dose CTSA of a ceramic HRA is similar in accuracy to RSA. CT is ubiquitous, and this method may be an alternative to RSA to measure prosthesis migration.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Low dose CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) to measure implant migration after ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA): A phantom study

Clarke

Logishetty

Cobb

2023

Proc Inst Mech Eng H

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Computed tomography (CT) offers direct 3-dimensional data that can serve as a substitute for traditional markers [12]. Preliminary arthroplasty studies with CT-based surface registration have shown comparable results to marker-based RSA without significant loss of accuracy or precision [13][14][15][16]. With respect to arthrokinematic studies, CTbased radiostereometry (CT-RSA) is not dependent on tantalum markers and, with surface detection, it could offer an alternative method for precision evaluation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry

Poulsen¹,

Stødle²,

Nordsletten³

et al. 2023

ActaO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and purpose: 3-dimensional midfoot motion is hard to evaluate in clinical practice. We present a new computed tomography (CT)-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) technique to examine in vivo midfoot kinematics during single-leg stance and compare it with marker-based radiostereometry (RSA).Patients and methods: 8 patients were examined with bilateral non- and full-weight-bearing CT images of the midfoot. 1st tarsometatarsal motion was analyzed using a surface-registration technique (CT-RSA). As all patients had unilateral tantalum markers in the 1st cuneiform (C1) and 1st metatarsal (M1), comparison of precision with markerbased RSA was performed. CT-RSA precision was evaluated with surface registration of both C1–M1 bone and C1–M1 tantalum markers, while RSA precision was determined with C1–M1 markers only. Additionally, to remove motion bias, we evaluated intrasegmental CT-RSA precision by comparing proximal with distal part of M1.Results: Under physical load, the primary movement for the 1st tarsometatarsal joint was M1 dorsiflexion (mean 1.4°), adduction (mean 1.4°), and dorsal translation (mean 1.1 mm). CT-RSA precision, using surface bone or markers, was in the range of 0.3–0.7 mm for translation and 0.6–1.6° for rotation. In comparison, RSA precision was in the range of 0.4–0.9 mm for translation and 1.0–1.7° for rotation. Finally, intrasegmental CT-RSA precision was in the range of 0.1–0.2 mm for translation and 0.4–0.5° for rotation.Conclusion: CT-RSA is a valid and precise, non-invasive method to measure midfoot kinematics when compared with conventional RSA.

show abstract

Accuracy and precision of Volumetric Matching Micromotion Analysis (V3MA) is similar to RSA for tibial component migration in TKA

de Laat,

Koster,

Stoel

et al. 2024

Journal Orthopaedic Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the current gold standard to determine implant migration, but it requires bone markers and special equipment. Therefore, we developed VoluMetric Matching Micromotion Analysis (V3MA), a software program for Computed Tomography‐based radiostereometric analysis (CT‐RSA). This study aimed to determine the accuracy and precision of V3MA in vitro compared to RSA and provide a clinical proof of concept. The accuracy (RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error)) and precision (SD (standard deviation)) of V3MA were compared to RSA. A tibial component was placed in 21 different positions within a cadaveric bone to assess accuracy. For precision, a total of 20 repeated zero‐migration examinations from 4 cadaveric bones with cemented tibial components were performed. In 6 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients 1 to 5 year migration was measured with V3MA and RSA. V3MA accuracy ranged between 0.02 and 0.09 mm for translations and was 0.01° for internal–external rotations. For RSA, the accuracy ranged between 0.03 and 0.09 mm for translations and was 0.09° for internal‐external rotations. V3MA precision ranged between 0.01 and 0.06 mm for translations and 0.02 to 0.07° for rotations. RSA precision ranged between 0.00 and 0.06 mm for translations and 0.04 to 0.25° for rotations. V3MA was successful in 6 clinical cases and no systematic bias was present. In conclusion, the accuracy and precision of V3MA were similar to RSA. Therefore, V3MA is a promising alternative to RSA in migration measurements of tibial components in TKA.

show abstract

Precision of low-dose CT-based micromotion analysis technique for the assessment of early acetabular cup migration compared with gold standard RSA: a prospective study of 30 patients up to 1 year

Cited by 10 publications

References 43 publications

Low dose CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) to measure implant migration after ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA): A phantom study

Low dose CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) to measure implant migration after ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA): A phantom study

CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry

Accuracy and precision of Volumetric Matching Micromotion Analysis (V3MA) is similar to RSA for tibial component migration in TKA

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About