2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-015-1356-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision QTL mapping of downy mildew resistance in hop (Humulus lupulus L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incorporating downy mildew resistance, appropriate agronomic characteristics, and aroma and flavor profiles desired by brewers is thus a long-term endeavor. Recently, quantitative trait loci (QTL) markers have been identified for downy mildew resistance that could be used to make marker-assisted selections for resistance and expedite identification of progeny with higher levels of resistance (Henning et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Incorporating downy mildew resistance, appropriate agronomic characteristics, and aroma and flavor profiles desired by brewers is thus a long-term endeavor. Recently, quantitative trait loci (QTL) markers have been identified for downy mildew resistance that could be used to make marker-assisted selections for resistance and expedite identification of progeny with higher levels of resistance (Henning et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial production of hops relies on sanitation, crown pruning, and fungicides as the main management tools for downy mildew (Skotland and Johnson 1983;Neve 1991;Gent and Ocamb 2009;Gent et al 2010;Gent et al 2012). While the most efficacious management tool is the production of resistant cultivars, no cultivars are completely immune to downy mildew and resistance appears to be highly quantitative and polygenic (Royle and Kremheller 1981;Neve 1991;Johnson et al 2009;Henning et al 2015). Some cultivars are highly susceptible to the crown rot phase of the disease (e.g., Cluster), while others can withstand some crown infection but are highly susceptible to the foliar phase of the disease (e.g., Nugget) (Coley-Smith 1964;Neve 1991;Johnson et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DMR in hops has been shown to be an inheritable and quantitative trait (Henning et al, 2015). Henning et al investigated resistance to primary infection with downy mildew in hop, while our study focused on the secondary infection event.…”
Section: Major Dmr Locus Likely Confers Resistance By Regulating Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powdery mildew reduces the quality and quantity of yield while increasing the cost of production [26]. Although Cascade has historically possessed disease resistance to fungal pathogens powdery mildew (Podosphaero macularis) [18] and downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora humuli) [27], there are still risks of damage by these fungal pathogens. A recent outbreak of powdery mildew affecting Cascade in the U.S. Pacific Northwest (PNW) was the result of a Cascade-adapted isolate of P. Macularis [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very little management was required to grow Cascade until powdery mildew was introduced in the PNW in the mid-1990s [28], and the rise of PM infection corresponds to an increase in Cascade acreage [18]. Hop breeding with resistant cultivars [26, 27, 29] can result in new resistance, but given the inevitability of pathogen adaptation, an understanding of the genomic features underlying resistance and susceptibility is necessary to breed for hop that can withstand pathogen adaptations. Past efforts in the identification of alleles, genes, and regulatory genomic regions have been hindered by an incomplete draft assembly [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%