2015
DOI: 10.2319/040115-214.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision, reproducibility, and accuracy of bone crest level measurements of CBCT cross sections using different resolutions

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the precision, reproducibility, and accuracy of alveolar crest level measurements on CBCT images obtained with different voxel sizes. Materials and Methods: CBCT exams were made of 12 dried human mandibles with voxel dimensions of 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 mm. Bone crest level was measured directly on the mandibles with a digital caliper and on CBCT images. Images were measured twice by two examiners. Intra-and interexaminer precision and reproducibility were assessed using paired and t-tests, r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cone-beam computed tomography correlates well with histomorphometrical measurements of peri-implant bone (Ritter et al, 2014). It has been shown that the precision and reproducibility of alveolar bone-level measurements are high for various voxel sizes (Menezes, Janson, da Silveira Massaro, Cambiaghi, & Garib, 2016). High-definition cone-beam computed tomography has been described as an accurate technique for millimeter-range measurements of bone structures in the direct vicinity of titanium implants (Gröbe et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cone-beam computed tomography correlates well with histomorphometrical measurements of peri-implant bone (Ritter et al, 2014). It has been shown that the precision and reproducibility of alveolar bone-level measurements are high for various voxel sizes (Menezes, Janson, da Silveira Massaro, Cambiaghi, & Garib, 2016). High-definition cone-beam computed tomography has been described as an accurate technique for millimeter-range measurements of bone structures in the direct vicinity of titanium implants (Gröbe et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 It is well known that the smaller the voxel size, the richer the imaging details. [16][17][18]25,26 Menezes et al 26 suggested that there was adequate precision for crestal bone measurements only when the voxel size was 0.3 mm or smaller. Also it is well known that the smaller the voxel size, the higher the ionizing radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this setting may impact on the quality of the images, it was selected to obtain the superimposition of CBCT images based on craniofacial anatomic landmarks(Alsufyani et al, 2014). Nevertheless, as regards image resolution,Menezes, Janson, da Silveira Massaro, Cambiaghi, and Garib (2016) found comparable accuracy in linear measurements of alveolar bone crest levels on dried human mandibles comparing to anatomic measurements for voxel dimensions of 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 mm. Similar results were obtained by de Rezende Barbosa, Wood, Pimenta, Maria de Almeida, and Tyndall (2016) in the calculation of jaw cleft volume and byMaret et al (2012) for tooth volumetric measurements (using micro-CBCT) using different FOVs and voxel sizes Kamburoğlu et al (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%