2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PrecisionFDA Truth Challenge V2: Calling variants from short and long reads in difficult-to-map regions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
96
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The seven reference samples of the Genome-in-a-Bottle (GIAB) consortium ( 29 ), comprising two trios, are among the most extensively sequenced samples in the world. Reference data from these samples are, for example, used in the PrecisionFDA truth challenge to determine the accuracy of variant calls ( 40 ). For variants called from TGS data, the mean PrecisionFDA recall and precision rates were 96,02% (95.53–97.47%, SD = 0.61%) and 98.79% (98.28–99.23%, SD = 0.28%), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seven reference samples of the Genome-in-a-Bottle (GIAB) consortium ( 29 ), comprising two trios, are among the most extensively sequenced samples in the world. Reference data from these samples are, for example, used in the PrecisionFDA truth challenge to determine the accuracy of variant calls ( 40 ). For variants called from TGS data, the mean PrecisionFDA recall and precision rates were 96,02% (95.53–97.47%, SD = 0.61%) and 98.79% (98.28–99.23%, SD = 0.28%), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We benchmarked our method using fully elucidated GIAB reference samples, including the Ashkenazim Jewish and the Han Chinese trios. Variant calling concordance was high for GIAB references in terms of recall (96,02%) and precision (98.79%) rates according to the PrecisionFDA Truth Challenge ( 40 ). The phenotypic blood group results from genotyping array for eight of the unknown patients perfectly matched the trivialised TGS results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome graphs are better suited for expressing the the genomic regions that have SNPs, indels and SVs than a linear reference sequence [36] since genome graphs combine the linear reference genome with the known genetic variations in the entire population as a graph-based data structure. Therefore, there is a growing trend towards using genome graphs [36,51,54,56,61,62,65,66,124,125] to more accurately express the genetic diversity in a population. With increasing importance and usage of genome graphs, having accurate and efficient tools for mapping genomic sequences to these graphs has become crucial.…”
Section: Graph-based Genome Sequence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple outgoing directed edges from a node captures genetic variations. Genome graphs are growing in popularity for a number of genomic applications, such as (1) variant calling [36,54,56], which identifies the genomic differences between the sequenced genome and the reference genome; (2) genome assembly [51,[57][58][59], which reconstructs the entire sequenced genome using the reads without utilizing a known reference genome sequence; (3) error correction [60][61][62], which corrects the noisy regions in long reads due to sequencing errors; and (4) multiple sequence alignment [63][64][65], which aligns three or more biological sequences of similar length. With the increasing importance and usage of genome graphs, having fast and efficient techniques and tools for mapping genomic sequences to genome graphs is now crucial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HiSAT2 (Kim et al, 2019) aligner has been previously shown to be highly accurate with improvements over Bowtie2 (Musich et al, 2021). Dragen (Illumina, Inc., 2021) has been further optimised for accurate variant calling in difficult to map regions of the genome and improved over previous versions in the PrecisionFDA Truth challenge V2 (Illumina, Inc., 2020a; Illumina, Inc., 2020b; Olson et al, 2021; Wagner et al, 2021). Introducing these aligners to the HiCUP+ pipeline allows these highly accurate mapping tools to be used in existing Hi-C data processing workflows.…”
Section: Accuracy and Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%