2017
DOI: 10.1017/laq.2017.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preclassic and Classic Maya Interregional and Long-Distance Exchange: A Diachronic Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts From Ceibal, Guatemala

Abstract: Mito, Ibaraki, Japan (kazuo.aoyama.1@vc.ibaraki.ac.jp) in the volcanic highlands. Each obsidian source is chemically distinct, and many sources can be distinguished based on instrumental attributions and optical criteria. For this reason obsidian has

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence for the production of stone tools, including obsidian blades, is most prevalent at these locations. Artisans specializing in blade production would have needed to acquire the raw obsidian to produce these items, and it appears the Ceibal crafters had a steady supply of these materials based on the quantity of lithic items found across the site during the Middle Preclassic period (Aoyama 2017a, 2017b). The microwear analysis indicates that the tools themselves were used primarily for shell, bone, and meat/hide processing, based on the preponderance of marks pertaining to these activities at the majority of the middens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence for the production of stone tools, including obsidian blades, is most prevalent at these locations. Artisans specializing in blade production would have needed to acquire the raw obsidian to produce these items, and it appears the Ceibal crafters had a steady supply of these materials based on the quantity of lithic items found across the site during the Middle Preclassic period (Aoyama 2017a, 2017b). The microwear analysis indicates that the tools themselves were used primarily for shell, bone, and meat/hide processing, based on the preponderance of marks pertaining to these activities at the majority of the middens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aoyama studied 86,624 lithic artifacts (1,802,882.3 g) recovered from different parts of Ceibal, including the central part of the settlement around Group A, outlying residential groups, and the nearby minor centers (Aoyama 2017a, 2017b; Aoyama et al 2017a, 2017b). Of these lithic artifacts, the CPAP has collected 37,116 chipped stone artifacts from unmixed Preclassic contexts, including 30,500 artifacts from the Middle Preclassic contexts.…”
Section: Overview Of the Materials Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the Late Preclassic period (350–100 BC), inhabitants were mining local obsidian sources to make fine blades and other cutting implements. The presence of this same obsidian at lowland Preclassic communities hundreds of kilometers away indicates that an obsidian trade network had been established by this time (Aoyama 2017; Love 2011). Kaminaljuyu's early elites likely used this trade network to their advantage and cemented political control through alliances in the region.…”
Section: Environment and History Of Kaminaljuyumentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to the pXRF analysis, one blade was manufactured from San Martín Jilotepeque obsidian, while the remaining 10 blades were made of El Chayal obsidian from the Guatemalan highlands. San Martín Jilotepeque was the principal source of obsidian at Ceibal and many other lowland Maya sites during the late Middle Preclassic period (Aoyama 2017a(Aoyama , 2017bHaines and Glascock 2012), so the fact that the majority of obsidian artifacts in Cache 123 were produced from El Chayal material is unusual. In fact, all the other obsidian artifacts in the present study were manufactured from San Martín Jilotepeque obsidian.…”
Section: Cache 123mentioning
confidence: 99%