“…Pracinostat was found to selectively accumulate in tumors which correlated well with increased and prolonged acetylation levels in tumor which, in turn correlated with high tumor growth inhibition in mice (Novotny-Diermayr et al, 2011). Preclinical ADME of Pracinostat was characterized by: a) in in vitro liver microsomal stability studies, Pracinostat was most stable in human and dog, moderate in mouse, and least stable in rat; b) uniform PPB of 84-94% in preclinical species and humans; c) was metabolized mainly by human CYP3A4 and 1A2; d) did not inhibit the major human CYPs except moderate inhibition of 2C19 (~ 6 µM); e) lack of significant induction of human CYP3A4 and 1A2 in vitro; f) metabolite identification studies using liver microsomes showed the formation of N-deethylation and bis-N-deethylation as major metabolites in addition to minor oxidative products; g) a glucoronidation product of SB939 was found as the major metabolite in rat urine following oral dosing; h) PK: high systemic clearance of 9.2, 4.5 and 1.5 L/h/kg in mice, rat and dog, respectively and high volume of distribution (V ss ranged between 1.7 to 4.2 L/kg) in preclinical species; i) moderate F in mice and dogs and poor in rats (Jayaraman et al, 2011). In PK/PD studies in HCT116 xenograft models, studying the relationship between tumor growth inhibition and the PK/PD indices such as AUC/IC 50,HCT116 , C max / IC 50,HCT116 , and time above IC 50,HCT116 , Pracinostat was found to have the highest PK/PD ratios for all the three PK/PD parameters when compared to Vorinostat, Panabinostat and Belinostat (figure 1) (Jayaraman et al, 2009).…”