2015
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2015.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preclinical targeting of human T-cell malignancies using CD4-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells

Abstract: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are aggressive lymphomas with no effective upfront standard treatment and ineffective options in relapsed disease, resulting in poorer clinical outcomes as compared with B-cell lymphomas. The adoptive transfer of T cells engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) is a promising new approach for treatment of hematological malignancies. However, preclinical reports of targeting T-cell lymphoma with CARs are almost non-existent. Here we have designed a CAR, CD4CAR,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
63
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain cell surface antigens such as CD5 (6) have been targeted using specific CARs, and downregulation of their expression in activated T cells has allowed effector cells to expand and yield a product. Similarly, CD4 has been targeted by CD8 + T cells expressing a CD4-specific CAR (7), and CARs discriminating between T cell receptor constant regions (TRBC1 or TRBC2) have also been developed, with the aim of eradicating whichever of the 2 compartments malignant transformation may have arisen in (8). In addition, CRIS-PR/Cas9-mediated disruption of CD7 expression has also recently been reported in T cells transduced to express a CD7-specific CAR (9), as well as alternative strategies deploying an anti-CD7 scFv linked to T cells engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) against B cell antigens are being investigated as cellular immunotherapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain cell surface antigens such as CD5 (6) have been targeted using specific CARs, and downregulation of their expression in activated T cells has allowed effector cells to expand and yield a product. Similarly, CD4 has been targeted by CD8 + T cells expressing a CD4-specific CAR (7), and CARs discriminating between T cell receptor constant regions (TRBC1 or TRBC2) have also been developed, with the aim of eradicating whichever of the 2 compartments malignant transformation may have arisen in (8). In addition, CRIS-PR/Cas9-mediated disruption of CD7 expression has also recently been reported in T cells transduced to express a CD7-specific CAR (9), as well as alternative strategies deploying an anti-CD7 scFv linked to T cells engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) against B cell antigens are being investigated as cellular immunotherapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of B-cell malignancies with anti-CD19 CART-cells has been one of the most important recent advances in the treatment of cancer, with sustainedremissions obtained in most patients with advanced and refractory B-ALL6,32 , as well as impressive though lesser responses in CLL7,33 and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 7 .Given the relatively similar presentation and nature of B-and T-cell malignancies,CART-cells could potentially have similar value in treating T-cell lymphomas.However, anti-CD19 CART efficacy is accompanied by loss of the normal B-cell compartment6,7 . While this is relatively well tolerated, and impact can be lessened by infusion of donor-derived pooled immunoglobulins, analogously targeting a pan-T-cell antigen on a T-cell malignancy (with concomitant permanent loss of normal T-cells) would be prohibitively toxic, with no mitigating replacement therapies available.Approaches using CARs against T-cell targets such as the pan T-cell antigen CD534 or CD4, which is present on a crucial subset of normal T-cells35 , have been proposed, but may prove unacceptably immunosuppressive in clinical use. With our approach, a patient treated with anti-TRBC1 CART would retain approximately 2/3 of normal Tcells, with polyclonal anti-viral immunity likely preserved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of new conditioning regimens and the use of alternate alloHCT donors [28][29][30] provides NHL patients eligible for alloHCT with more treatment options not limited by their age. The data from this retrospective study are even more relevant now with the availability of treatment with autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and donor-derived CAR T [40][41][42] or the administration of CAR T cells after relapse post-alloHCT [39,[43][44][45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%