2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2006.11723
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precobordism and cobordism

Toni Annala

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to compare three versions of bivariant algebraic cobordism: the bivariant algebraic cobordism, the universal precobordism, and the operational algebraic cobordism. We show that there is a very close relationship between universal precobordism and bivariant algebraic cobordism, and that, over a base field of characteristic 0, the former can be used to give a new presentation of the algebraic bordism groups of Levine-Morel, which simplifies slightly the presentation achieved by Lowre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand Annala has recently constructed good theories of algebraic cobordism and Chow cohomology of singular schemes in characteristic zero [An1]. After further simplification and partial extension to general bases in [AnYo,An2], the generators are similar to those of A * der but a simple description of the relations needed to pass from cobordism to Chow does not yet seem to be known. Any relation with filtrations on K-theory has not been studied beyond the remarks above as far as I know and comparisons with the Levine-Weibel Chow groups [LW] also have yet to be investigated.…”
Section: And the Fundamental Class [X ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand Annala has recently constructed good theories of algebraic cobordism and Chow cohomology of singular schemes in characteristic zero [An1]. After further simplification and partial extension to general bases in [AnYo,An2], the generators are similar to those of A * der but a simple description of the relations needed to pass from cobordism to Chow does not yet seem to be known. Any relation with filtrations on K-theory has not been studied beyond the remarks above as far as I know and comparisons with the Levine-Weibel Chow groups [LW] also have yet to be investigated.…”
Section: And the Fundamental Class [X ]mentioning
confidence: 99%