70th EAGE Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2008 2008
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20147759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preconditioning for Linearised Inversion of Attenuation and Velocity Perturbations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Devaney and Sherman (1982), the non-uniqueness in scattering should disappear if multiple experiments are performed, for instance, at more than a single offset. Ribodetti et al (1995) and Hak and Mulder (2008a) consider deltafunction type perturbations or point scatterers. Its Fourier transform in depth contains long-wavelength components, including the zero wavelength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Devaney and Sherman (1982), the non-uniqueness in scattering should disappear if multiple experiments are performed, for instance, at more than a single offset. Ribodetti et al (1995) and Hak and Mulder (2008a) consider deltafunction type perturbations or point scatterers. Its Fourier transform in depth contains long-wavelength components, including the zero wavelength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ribodetti et al (1995) and Hak & Mulder (2008) consider delta‐function type perturbations or point scatterers. Its Fourier transform in depth contains long‐wavelength components, including the zero wavelength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider simple 2D examples for which the Green functions are available and the full Hessian can be readily computed. In earlier publications (Hak and Mulder 2008a,b), we considered various non‐diagonal preconditioners for the linearized inverse problems but once we realized the existence of the ambiguity mentioned above, we concluded that such preconditioning will never help in providing a proper answer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%