SUMMARY Isopotential body surface distributions derived from 14 subjects with acute anterior and 14 patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction were studied to examine three possible difficulties with STsegment summation methods as used for evaluation of infarction severity. First, recorded sums of potentials recorded from 150 electrodes placed on anterior and posterior thoracic surfaces and from five subsets of 42 electrodes located only on the left anterior precordium were compared. Lead subsets detected only one-half of total thoracic positivity in acute anterior infarction and the sums of potentials in these sets were significantly altered by small (approximately 1-1.5-inch) deviations in grid location. Second, differing isopotential distributions could yield nearly identical sums of potentials in left precordial electrode grids. Third, the effects of the wide variations in the normal ST-segment isopotential distribution were evaluated by studying 45 normal subjects and application of difference map and departure map techniques. The results illustrate the significant variation in potentials considered to be generated by the ischemic lesion caused by differences in control patterns. Thus, the recording of potential sums over limited torso areas, the attention to potential magnitudes rather than to distributions and the assumption that the normal ST segment is isoelectric represent significant problems in applying ECG methods to the quantitative evaluation of myocardial intarction.STUDY of the electrocardiographic ST-segment is of proved value in the diagnosis and localization of acute myocardial infarction.1 2 Recent studies have attempted to extend these applications to include the assessment of the size or severity of the acute ischemic lesions.3-Techniques to register these ECG potentials have included standard electrocardiography6 and vectorcardiography,7 summation of potentials recorded from left precordial multielectrode grids3-and, most recently, body surface isopotential mapping.8 The last two approaches are clearly related, in that the data set recorded by the former is but a specific subset of that sensed by the latter. Thus, it may be supposed that the adequacy of left precordial electrode grid methods may be evaluated by determining the properties of the parent set of total thoracic surface potentials.We used this approach to investigate three expected9 12 but heretofore unquantitated difficulties with the left precordial summation approach. These include (1) the assumption that the premorbid or normal ST segment is truly isoelectric, and hence, that all postinfarction potentials are due to the ischemic lesion; (2) sideration of the spatial distribution of the injurycurrent forces. Methods
Study PopulationsTwenty-eight men, ages 44-63 years, were investigated during the first 48 hours after the onset of acute myocardial infarction, as diagnosed by standard historical, electrocardiographic and enzymatic techniques. All patients were hospitalized in an intensive care area, were clinically st...