2017
DOI: 10.5771/0023-4834-2017-2-166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precrime und Strafvollzug Resozialisierungsanspruch und Situation von Gefangenen bei prognoseabhängiger Entlassung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these hopes are often dashed, and the psychological power turns out to be a form of "responsibilization" (Crewe 2011, Larrauri 2020). There are indications that this is the same in Germany (Graebsch 2017a). The experts who give their opinion are selected by the court or the prison administration.…”
Section: The Right To Prison Leave and Discretionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these hopes are often dashed, and the psychological power turns out to be a form of "responsibilization" (Crewe 2011, Larrauri 2020). There are indications that this is the same in Germany (Graebsch 2017a). The experts who give their opinion are selected by the court or the prison administration.…”
Section: The Right To Prison Leave and Discretionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The pressure to prove that a prisoner is reformed pervades the experience of imprisonment, as is well known from international research (Crewe 2011) and letters to the Prison Archive (Graebsch 2017a). It is very difficult for a prisoner to challenge a witness's expert status, and this is something that is rarely called into question in practice (Galli 2011, 43 et seqq.).…”
Section: Prognosis Therapeutization and Soft Powermentioning
confidence: 99%