2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-020-01280-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precursory ground deformation of the 2018 phreatic eruption on Iwo-Yama volcano, revealed by four-dimensional joint analysis of airborne and spaceborne InSAR

Abstract: We present detailed maps of local-scale 3D deformation preceding the 2018 phreatic eruption at Iwo-yama volcano (south of Kyushu Island, Japan), using a combination of airborne and spaceborne Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data. The 3D and 2.5D deformation maps obtained at different periods allow us to successfully track their spatiotemporal evolution and to infer the transition of subsurface conditions responsible for the precursory deformation observed from 2014 to 2018. From 2014 to 2016, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the 2018 MPCG eruption we detected a progressive ground deformation by a borehole tiltmeter network. Although satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is useful for observing spatial surface deformation associated with a phreatic eruption (e.g., Kobayashi et al 2018;Narita et al 2020), a tiltmeter network with high temporal resolution and dense spatial distribution provides details of progressive ground deformation during an eruption (e.g., Ueda et al 2013;Aloisi et al 2019;Zobin et al 2020). Our crack model implies that inflation of 5.1 × 10 5 m 3 beneath the main crater (MC) at Kagamike-kita PC for 2 min was followed by deflation of 3.6 × 10 5 m 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 2018 MPCG eruption we detected a progressive ground deformation by a borehole tiltmeter network. Although satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is useful for observing spatial surface deformation associated with a phreatic eruption (e.g., Kobayashi et al 2018;Narita et al 2020), a tiltmeter network with high temporal resolution and dense spatial distribution provides details of progressive ground deformation during an eruption (e.g., Ueda et al 2013;Aloisi et al 2019;Zobin et al 2020). Our crack model implies that inflation of 5.1 × 10 5 m 3 beneath the main crater (MC) at Kagamike-kita PC for 2 min was followed by deflation of 3.6 × 10 5 m 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1g). There is a minor peak location change during 2016-2018 around the Iwo-yama crater (Narita et al, 2020). Geochemical analysis in 2016 shows that the water is meteoric (Tajima et al, 2020), suggesting the upward migration of magmatic fluid is not the primary direct driver.…”
Section: Iwo-yama: Triple-source Hydrothermal Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1gi). Localized pre-eruptive inflation suggests a very shallow pressure source at 150 m depth beneath the crater (Narita et al, 2020). Fumarolic activity and mud ejection continued from the southern and western vents as of December 2019 (JMA, 2019).…”
Section: The 2008-2019 Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unrest of Iwo‐yama started with an increase in seismicity in December 2013, followed by tremors in August 2014, thermal anomalies and weak fumarolic activity since December 2015, a steam blowout event on April 27, 2017, at the crater, and small phreatic eruptions on April 19 and 20, 2018, at two newly appeared vents on the southern and western side of the crater with plume heights of 100–200 m (Tajima et al., 2020; dashed blue lines in Figures 1g–1i). Localized pre‐eruptive inflation suggests a very shallow pressure source at 150 m depth beneath the crater (Narita et al., 2020). Fumarolic activity and mud ejection continued from the southern and western vents as of December 2019 (Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), 2019).…”
Section: The 2008–2019 Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation