2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2008.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precursory phenomena associated with large avalanches in the long-range connective sandpile (LRCS) model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large avalanches are then followed by a period of quiescence and a new approach back toward the critical state ( Fig. 2) [11][12][13]. Such process is similar to the dynamical process of the earthquake fault system which repeats by reloading energy and rebuilding correlation lengths towards criticality and the next great event [18][19][20]33,34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Large avalanches are then followed by a period of quiescence and a new approach back toward the critical state ( Fig. 2) [11][12][13]. Such process is similar to the dynamical process of the earthquake fault system which repeats by reloading energy and rebuilding correlation lengths towards criticality and the next great event [18][19][20]33,34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We have previously proposed a long-range connective sandpile (LRCS) model by introducing randomly remote connections between two separated cells [10][11][12][13]. For a square lattice of L by L cells, we randomly throw sands, one at a time, onto the grid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now, let us see the result of fractal dimension. Some researches show the decrease of the fractal dimensions before a great rupture (Carpinteri et al, 2009;Goltz, 1997;Kiyashchenko et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2008;Matcharashvili et al, 2000;Radulian and Trifu, 1991). Because the correlation dimension D 2 is the most typical in the fractal dimensions, we only research D 2 in this paper.…”
Section: Local Scaling Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li (lqdzjybzx@126.com) has also been shown in multifractal research on seismic activity that the spectrum of generalised dimensions and the singularity spectrum display characteristic changes before large earthquakes (Caruso et al, 2006;Dimitriu et al, 2000;Nakaya, 2005;Roy and Padhi, 2007). Some results have confirmed that the decrease in fractal dimension, the steepening of curves in the generalised dimension spectrum and the broadening of the value range in the singularity spectrum, can be taken as indicators of an unstable state of an earthquake system before a large rupture (Carpinteri et al, 2009;Goltz, 1997;Kiyashchenko et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2008;Matcharashvili et al, 2000;Radulian and Trifu, 1991;Telesca et al, 2005;Telesca and Lapenna, 2006). However, there are some shortcomings in the research: the mono-fractal dimension is not sufficient to characterise heterogeneous fractals (Grassberger and Procaccia, 1984;Kentz and Schreiber, 1997), while the generalised dimension spectrum and singularity spectrum can only represent a global description of the scaling properties (Chhabra and Jensen, 1989;Grassberger, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%