2004
DOI: 10.1139/z04-011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predation by red fox on European roe deer fawns in relation to age, sex, and birth date

Abstract: Mortality in radio-marked European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus (Linnaeus, 1758)) neonates was studied during 14 years in a mixed forest–agricultural landscape in Sweden. A total of 233 fawns were marked. Births were synchronized, with 79% occurring during 25 days and a peak between 25 May and 7 June encompassing 62% of the births. Overall mortality was 42%, but in three single years, it exceeded 85%. Predation by red fox (Vulpes vulpes Desmarest, 1820) accounted for 81% of total mortality. The effects of age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The powerful effect of infant mortality on ungulate population dynamics is well-documented (Gaillard et al, 1998;Gaillard et al, 2000;Raithel et al, 2007). However, the postpartum period is not usually included in studies of infant mortality (Smith & Anderson, 1996;Singer et al, 1997;Janermo et al, 2004;Olson et al, 2005;DeVivo et al, 2011;Buuveibaatar et al, 2013), suggesting that most studies underestimate infant mortality and predation risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The powerful effect of infant mortality on ungulate population dynamics is well-documented (Gaillard et al, 1998;Gaillard et al, 2000;Raithel et al, 2007). However, the postpartum period is not usually included in studies of infant mortality (Smith & Anderson, 1996;Singer et al, 1997;Janermo et al, 2004;Olson et al, 2005;DeVivo et al, 2011;Buuveibaatar et al, 2013), suggesting that most studies underestimate infant mortality and predation risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The postpartum period is difficult to predict and observe due to its brevity and the skittishness of parturient females (Fraser, 1968). Studies of ungulate infant mortality, therefore, rely on remote monitoring of infant survival beginning hours or days after birth, once the offspring has already survived the vulnerable postpartum period (e.g., Smith & Anderson, 1996;Singer et al, 1997;Janermo et al, 2004;Olson et al, 2005;DeVivo et al, 2011;Buuveibaatar et al, 2013). Information regarding neonate mortality risk and the role of maternal decisions in determining neonate survival during the postpartum period is thus integral to our understanding of ungulate population dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vincent in sod., 1995;Hewison, 1997) in/ali zgodnja smrtnost mladičev (npr. Linnell in sod., 1995;Jarnemo, 2004;Panzacchi in sod., 2009). Poznavanje teh parametrov je odločilno za določanje najprimernejših strategij trajnostnega upravljanja z vrsto, ki bodo ustrezne tako z ekološkega kot tudi gospodarskega vidika.…”
Section: Reproductive Potential Of Roe Deerunclassified
“…Vincent et al, 1995;Hewison, 1997) and/or early fawn mortality (e.g. Linnell et al, 1995;Jarnemo, 2004;Panzacchi et al, 2009). In contrast, there has been some research on the reproduction of chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra L.), red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) and wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) (Valentinčič, 1975;Žele, 2000;Mihelič, 2009;Jelenko et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In higher vertebrates, sex-selective abortion is rather unlikely as the costs will usually be much higher than the expected benefits. This is particularly significant in roe deer, as fawn mortality is generally high (up to 90%) in both sexes as a result of external influences such as harsh weather conditions (Gaillard et al 1993a) and predation (Aanes & Linnell et al 1995;Andersen 1996;Jarnemo et al 2004). Furthermore, parents are able to adjust their investment levels to their Sex ratio variation in roe deer offspring s sex, thereby minimizing any costs of an inability to control their offspring s sex ratio.…”
Section: General Assumption: Females Affect the Sex Ratio Prenatalmentioning
confidence: 99%