2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20333-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predator arrival elicits differential dispersal, change in age structure and reproductive performance in a prey population

Abstract: Predators are an important ecological and evolutionary force shaping prey population dynamics. Ecologists have extensively assessed the lethal effects of invasive predators on prey populations. However, the role of non-lethal effects, such as physiological stress or behavioural responses like dispersal, has been comparatively overlooked and their potential population effects remain obscure. Over the last 23 years, we developed a mark-recapture program for the Audouin’s gull and an intensive carnivore monitorin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as avian females usually move greater distances during dispersal than males [49,50], we expect to find this general pattern among all urban and rural individuals. Social features such as conspecific density and productivity can be used by individuals as indicators of habitat quality, such that dispersers would prefer to move to high-density and high-productivity areas [51,52,53]. However, young individuals born in very dense areas could also disperse to low-density areas to avoid intraspecific competition [54,55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as avian females usually move greater distances during dispersal than males [49,50], we expect to find this general pattern among all urban and rural individuals. Social features such as conspecific density and productivity can be used by individuals as indicators of habitat quality, such that dispersers would prefer to move to high-density and high-productivity areas [51,52,53]. However, young individuals born in very dense areas could also disperse to low-density areas to avoid intraspecific competition [54,55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main ecological drivers explaining the temporal variability of demographic parameters in this species have been previously identified. Variations in adult survival seem to be partially explained by bycatch mortality ) and occasional local predation by carnivores (Payo-Payo et al 2018). Other local factors, including food availability or predators, may affect other fitness parameters such as fertility (Oro et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, from a conservation point of view, we propose an update of its conservation status. The main actual threat for the species is likely fisheries bycatch , carnivore predation within some colonies (Payo-Payo et al 2018), a general decrease of fertility due to regime shifts in small pelagic dynamics (Van Beveren et al 2016), increased niche competition and loss of available suitable breeding habitat (Oro et al 2009, Almaraz andOro 2011). The species seems to respond to local disturbances with the colonization of new habitats (Payo-Payo et al 2017); however, this process does not compensate for the global population decline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly from a social point of view, the species breeds aggregated in spatially discrete patches within large colonies. Each breeding season, some patches go extinct and some are colonized 41 , 42 , with a patch occupation expectancy over time of 1.5 years 24 , forcing individuals to breed in patches different from the ones they were born in or they bred in the previous year. These colonization-extinction processes dismiss the possibility of aggregation only due to natal or breeding philopatry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ). This collapse was due to the arrival of terrestrial predators, which led this colony to hold from 70% to only 3% of the total world population in only a decade (32% mean annual decline) 41 , 43 (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%