DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180814-5569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predator-avoidance behaviors of white-tailed deer that favor fawn survival

Abstract: This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, fawns were visited randomly, and the time of contacts and the length of time between successive contacts became variable, limiting the predator's ability to predict optimal times to observe individual females. Huegel (1985) reported less association than expected during early evening hours, while in the present study association frequency was higher than expected around this time. These differences may be viewed as adaptations to different predators.…”
Section: Frequencycontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, fawns were visited randomly, and the time of contacts and the length of time between successive contacts became variable, limiting the predator's ability to predict optimal times to observe individual females. Huegel (1985) reported less association than expected during early evening hours, while in the present study association frequency was higher than expected around this time. These differences may be viewed as adaptations to different predators.…”
Section: Frequencycontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…The mother must memorize the young's bedding site, initiate contacts, ingest urine and feces, guide the young to new bedding sites, and give no clues about its location by body orientation and activity patterns (Byers and Byers, 1983;Geist, 1981). Perhaps most importantly, successful protection of young should represent a careful arrangement of spatial relations, timing of contact periods, and frequency of association between mother and young (Huegel, 1985). This arrangement should be closely tuned to the composition and density of predators, to habitat characteristics such as the distribution of food and hiding cover (Geist, 1974), and to the physical development of the young.…”
Section: Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported previously in white-tailed deer by Downing and McGinnes (1969), White et al (1972), Bartush and Lewis (1978), Ozoga et al (1982), Huegel (1985), in black-tailed deer by Linsdale and Tomich (1953), and in roe deer by Bubenik (1965) and Espmark (1969) study the isolation period was never interrupted during the first three weeks and can be viewed as an adaptation to predation. Fawns younger than two weeks old can not outrun human capture (Downing andMcGinnes 1969, Cook et αϊ.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Fawns younger than two weeks old can not outrun human capture (Downing andMcGinnes 1969, Cook et αϊ. 1971) and are probably unable to avoid predator capture consistently before three to four weeks old (Huegel 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation