2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00842.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predator diversity strengthens trophic cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behaviour

Abstract: Although human‐mediated extinctions disproportionately affect higher trophic levels, the ecosystem consequences of declining diversity are best known for plants and herbivores. We combined field surveys and experimental manipulations to examine the consequences of changing predator diversity for trophic cascades in kelp forests. In field surveys we found that predator diversity was negatively correlated with herbivore abundance and positively correlated with kelp abundance. To assess whether this relationship … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
182
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(146 reference statements)
16
182
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we provide contrary evidence that diverse protists mixtures substantially reduced bacterial cell numbers ( Supplementary Figure 2). This is further supported by theory (Thebault andLoreau, 2003, 2006), suggesting that increasing generalist predator richness may have a greater effect on prey abundance than increasing specialist predator richness, as well as by field and laboratory studies (Gamfeldt et al, 2005;Byrnes et al, 2006;Griffin et al, 2008) showing that higher consumer or predator biomass because of increasing richness concomitantly resulted in reduced prey biomass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Here, we provide contrary evidence that diverse protists mixtures substantially reduced bacterial cell numbers ( Supplementary Figure 2). This is further supported by theory (Thebault andLoreau, 2003, 2006), suggesting that increasing generalist predator richness may have a greater effect on prey abundance than increasing specialist predator richness, as well as by field and laboratory studies (Gamfeldt et al, 2005;Byrnes et al, 2006;Griffin et al, 2008) showing that higher consumer or predator biomass because of increasing richness concomitantly resulted in reduced prey biomass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Urban management techniques such as treading, bird feeding, mowing and pesticide application negatively impact predacious beetles and hemipterans (Morris and Rispin 1987;Helden and Leather 2004;Orros and Fellowes 2012;Jones and Leather 2012;Orros et al 2015;Bennett and Lovell 2014;Smith et al 2015). Human-induced extinctions and local extirpations are often biased towards higher trophic levels (Pauly et al 1998;Jackson et al 2001;Duffy 2002;Byrnes et al 2005), and that losses of even one or two species that belong to higher trophic levels can cause cascading effects on species present on basal trophic levels (Paine 2002;Schmitz 2003) and critically affect ecosystem processes (Tilman et al 1997;Byrnes et al 2005;Hooper et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of predator diversity in regulating plant and herbivore dynamics and ecosystem functioning is complex (Ives et al 2005, Duffy et al 2007, Bruno and Cardinale 2008, Letourneau et al 2009). Many reports show that increasing predator diversity can either strengthen or weaken the predator effect on other trophic levels (e.g., Losey and Denno 1998, Sinclair et al 2003, Byrnes et al 2006, Schmitz 2009). As found in plant diversity-ecosystem functioning relationships, mechanisms underlying positive effects of predator diversity on predation rate could include sampling effects and complementary use of prey taxa or foraging microhabitats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%