2000
DOI: 10.3354/meps203275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predator-prey relations at a spawning aggregation site of coral reef fishes

Abstract: Predation is a selective force hypothesized to influence the spawning behavior of coral reef fishes. This study describes and quantifies the predatory activities of 2 piscivorous (Caranx melampygus and Aphareus furca) and 2 planktivorous (Melichthys niger and M. vidua) fishes at a coral reef fish-spawning aggregation site in Johnston Atoll (Central Pacific). To characterize predator-prey relations, the spawning behavior of prey species was quantified simultaneously with measurements of predatory activity, curr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spawning fishes have a greater susceptibility to predation because their attention to courtship and spawning activities can reduce their awareness of potential predators (Candolin & Voigt 1998, Sancho 2000. Increased habitat rugosity reduces the risk of predation on fishes (Hixon & Beets 1993), and other studies have shown a relationship between increased rugosity and spawning site selection (Sabo & Orth 1994, Sancho et al 2000a.…”
Section: Habitat Variationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spawning fishes have a greater susceptibility to predation because their attention to courtship and spawning activities can reduce their awareness of potential predators (Candolin & Voigt 1998, Sancho 2000. Increased habitat rugosity reduces the risk of predation on fishes (Hixon & Beets 1993), and other studies have shown a relationship between increased rugosity and spawning site selection (Sabo & Orth 1994, Sancho et al 2000a.…”
Section: Habitat Variationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, distinctive physical structures at these sites may act as a visual signal to assemble individuals that are widely dispersed outside the spawning season (Moyer & Zaiser 1981). Aggregation sites may provide a reduced risk of predation for spawners because of some unique habitat attributes (Sancho et al 2000a). The most widely applied hypothesis for the selection of spawning sites by aggregative and non-aggregative species is that currents at the site favour the rapid transport away from the reef of newly fertilized eggs and hatching larvae (the off-reef transport hypothesis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spawning at dusk invokes a variety of benefits for both offspring and spawning adults (e.g., Johannes 1978;Lobel 1978;Thresher 1984b;Sancho et al 2000a). From the offspring's perspective, low levels of feeding activity by planktivores at dusk may reduce egg predation (e.g., Johannes 1978;Lobel 1978; but see Sancho et al 2000b) and thus promote the transport of eggs off the reef during night. On the other hand, from the perspective of spawning adults, spawning at dusk may decrease the risk of predation because piscivores are also likely to be inactive at dusk (Sweatman 1984;Sancho et al 2000b; but see Hobson 1972;Lobel 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From the offspring's perspective, low levels of feeding activity by planktivores at dusk may reduce egg predation (e.g., Johannes 1978;Lobel 1978; but see Sancho et al 2000b) and thus promote the transport of eggs off the reef during night. On the other hand, from the perspective of spawning adults, spawning at dusk may decrease the risk of predation because piscivores are also likely to be inactive at dusk (Sweatman 1984;Sancho et al 2000b; but see Hobson 1972;Lobel 1978). Predation avoidance by both adults and offspring might therefore account for spawning at dusk in C. ornatipinnis, although this would seem to be difficult to prove.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are among the first to suggest the possibility of growth limitation in oceanic island fish populations. Furthermore, since there are conflicting published reports of the trophic position of M. niger from different locations (Randall 1967;Aiken 1975;Sancho et al 2000;Sazima et al 2003), we establish whether these populations differ obviously in diet and in condition. Published accounts of density and distribution of this species are then discussed in relation to ecological and life history factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%