2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2019.106843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predecessors of topologies of LCA groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove this claim, we note that ∕ ≠ ∕ = because ∕ is not Hausdorff. Therefore, we conclude that ↾ = ↾ according to Lemma 4.1 in [17].…”
Section: A C K N O W L E D G M E N Tmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To prove this claim, we note that ∕ ≠ ∕ = because ∕ is not Hausdorff. Therefore, we conclude that ↾ = ↾ according to Lemma 4.1 in [17].…”
Section: A C K N O W L E D G M E N Tmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…To prove this claim, we note that σ/Hjτ/Hj=τj because σ/Hj is not Hausdorff. Therefore, we conclude that σHj=τHj according to Lemma 4.1 in [17]. Since K is a subgroup of Gj, so xy=yx for all xHj and yK.…”
Section: Non‐abelian Lower Continuous Topological Groupsmentioning
confidence: 74%