2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictability of Painful Stimulation Modulates Subjective and Physiological Responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, nociceptive and nonnociceptive trials were interspersed at random, with no warning as to which trial was about to appear, which could have increased pain unpleasantness to nonnociceptive stimuli. It is known that uncertainty about the timing of a painful stimulus can increase pain unpleasantness ratings (Oka et al 2010, Price et al 1980 and that expecting to receive a painful stimulus can actually increase the perceived painfulness of a nonpainful or mildly painful stimulus (Atlas et al 2010, Sawamoto et al 2000. Thus, it is also possible that the design of the study, which involved expecting painful stimulation on some trials but not knowing when these trials were going to occur, led subjects to experience a greater sense of pain even in response to stimuli that were not intended to be painful.…”
Section: Wwwannualreviewsorg • Social Pain and The Brain 617mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, nociceptive and nonnociceptive trials were interspersed at random, with no warning as to which trial was about to appear, which could have increased pain unpleasantness to nonnociceptive stimuli. It is known that uncertainty about the timing of a painful stimulus can increase pain unpleasantness ratings (Oka et al 2010, Price et al 1980 and that expecting to receive a painful stimulus can actually increase the perceived painfulness of a nonpainful or mildly painful stimulus (Atlas et al 2010, Sawamoto et al 2000. Thus, it is also possible that the design of the study, which involved expecting painful stimulation on some trials but not knowing when these trials were going to occur, led subjects to experience a greater sense of pain even in response to stimuli that were not intended to be painful.…”
Section: Wwwannualreviewsorg • Social Pain and The Brain 617mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed effect model statistical analyses revealed that SEP and VAS score decreased significantly with increasing mixture concentration ( Clinical observations suggest that the perceived intensity of a painful event increases as the unpredictability of its occurrence increases. Therefore, third, we examined the effect of varying stimulus predictability on SEP and pain report (PR) and fear report (FR) scores in 25 healthy volunteers experiencing repeated noxious fingertip shocks (Oka et al, 2010). Each volunteer was exposed to high and low stimulus intensities administered in four stimulus patterns defined by the stimulus sequence (SEQ) and interstimulus interval (ISI) as follows: A) serial stimulus intensity SEQ with a fixed ISI; B) serial stimulus intensity SEQ with varying ISI; C) random stimulus intensity SEQ with fixed ISI; and D) random stimulus intensity SEQ with varying ISI.…”
Section: Pain Research Using Sepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IU, therefore, may be an important factor in explaining why humans differ so much in their response to pain. Specifically, IU may play a modulating role in situations where uncertainty prevails, especially when uncertainty regarding the timing of painful events abounds [14,15]. To indicate the time of onset of the stimulation, and its predictability or non-predictability, many types of cueing designs can be used, such as sound cueing and visual cueing [11,14,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To indicate the time of onset of the stimulation, and its predictability or non-predictability, many types of cueing designs can be used, such as sound cueing and visual cueing [11,14,16]. Both variations (predictability and length of the delay before the shock) have shown their influence on pain perception [14,15,17]. Indeed, recent studies confirm that when the timing of pain cannot be fully predicted, some react quite poorly and report increased pain [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation