2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10940-016-9312-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictable Policing: Measuring the Crime Control Benefits of Hotspots Policing at Bus Stops

Abstract: Objectives A fairly robust body of evidence suggests that hotspots policing is an effective crime prevention strategy. In this paper, we present contradictory evidence of a backfiring effect.Methods In a randomized controlled trial, aimed at reducing crime and disorder, London's 'hottest' 102 bus-stops were targeted. Double patrol teams of Metropolitan Police Service uniformed officers visited the stops three times per shift (12:00-20:00), 5-times per week, for a duration of 15 min, over a 6 month period. Cruc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
45
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Deterrence theory offers the requirement of a heightened level of appreciation that not only is someone observing our behavior but that the observing entity will punish us for transgressions. At a high level of abstraction, there is ample evidence that the perceived certainty of punishment is causally associated with less rule-breaking (Ariel and Partridge 2016;Bushway and Reuter 2008;Lochner 2003;Loughran et al 2012;McCord and Conway 2002;Nagin 2013a;Nagin 2013b;Paternoster 2010;Pratt et al 2006;but cf. Berk and MacDonald 2010;Tonry 2008;Wikström and Treiber 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deterrence theory offers the requirement of a heightened level of appreciation that not only is someone observing our behavior but that the observing entity will punish us for transgressions. At a high level of abstraction, there is ample evidence that the perceived certainty of punishment is causally associated with less rule-breaking (Ariel and Partridge 2016;Bushway and Reuter 2008;Lochner 2003;Loughran et al 2012;McCord and Conway 2002;Nagin 2013a;Nagin 2013b;Paternoster 2010;Pratt et al 2006;but cf. Berk and MacDonald 2010;Tonry 2008;Wikström and Treiber 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are police departments in which officers are fully cognizant that their interactions with the public are documented and that there is a strong likelihood of apprehension for rule violations. In the language of deterrence theory, Bsanction threats^(see Ariel and Partridge 2016) were at their peak, and in the language of self-awareness theory, BWCs may have triggered a strong cognitive process of selfscrutiny (i.e., Bam I doing the right thing right now?^). BWCs caused a significant reduction in the application of force .…”
Section: Bover-deterrencetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although quantifying displacement effects require intricate measurements, this phenomenon is often prominently observed to be a result of highly focused police activities (6, 7). In truth, the unintended adverse consequences of implementing anti-drug initiatives and drug control mechanisms are not new concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Police presence may not always create a general deterrent effect if there is too much predictability associated with the officers' presence. That may explain why, for example, victim-reported crimes actually went up around bus stops when police focused patrols on bus stops with high levels of crime, predictably leaving with the buses for a police-free period of time in which to prey on victims (Ariel and Partridge 2016). If offenders, in general, can predict when and where police visits are going to occur, residual deterrence will be lost and crime may go up.…”
Section: Deterrence Theory For Hot Spot Patrolsmentioning
confidence: 99%