2014
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicted 25(OH)D Score and Colorectal Cancer Risk According to Vitamin D Receptor Expression

Abstract: Background Despite accumulating evidence for the preventive effect of vitamin D on colorectal carcinogenesis, its precise mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesized that vitamin D was associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer with high-level vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression, but not with risk of tumor with low-level VDR expression. Methods Among 140,418 participants followed from 1986 through 2008 in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals' Follow-up Study, we identified 1,059 incide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2830) Table 6 shows a summary of studies that evaluated the association of circulating levels of vitamin D and risk of CRC. (24) , (13) ,(11, 12, 31) The pooled relative risk (RR) of CRC for the highest versus lowest categories of 25(OH)D was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.80). (13) A 10 ng/mL increase in 25(OH)D value was associated with a RR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2830) Table 6 shows a summary of studies that evaluated the association of circulating levels of vitamin D and risk of CRC. (24) , (13) ,(11, 12, 31) The pooled relative risk (RR) of CRC for the highest versus lowest categories of 25(OH)D was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.80). (13) A 10 ng/mL increase in 25(OH)D value was associated with a RR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) Epidemiology studies of vitamin D intake and predicted vitamin D plasma status have been fairly consistent in suggesting an association between higher vitamin D and reduced colorectal cancer risk, 10 ,(8) but limited data exist on women. (9) (10) (11) (12) A recent observational study meta-analysis reported a 26% lower risk of colorectal cancer per 10 ng/mL increment in blood 25(OH)D levels. (13) Vitamin D supplementation randomized control trials have not been supportive of an association between vitamin D and colorectal cancer, but this lack of association may be influenced by the dose of vitamin D used or the duration of the intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association with disease incidence and latitude is not unique to IBD; there is supporting parallel evidence of a north-south gradient in the incidence of other autoimmune and gastrointestinal diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (34) and colorectal cancer (35)(36)(37) . For colorectal cancer, geographic region (37) , predicted (38) and measured pre-diagnostic circulating 25(OH)D have been linked with disease risk (36) .…”
Section: Proceedings Of the Nutrition Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, more mechanistic studies are needed to identify and confirm the mechanism by which vitamin may exert anti-inflammation effects in CD. (36)(37)(38)70) . Ananthakrishnan et al (71) , recently reported an increased risk of colorectal cancer in a cohort (n 2809) of patients with IBD who were vitamin D deficient (25(0H)D <50 nmol/l).…”
Section: Vitamin D Status and Associations With Disease Severity In Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the NHS, NHSII, and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, we developed a model to predict plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] in which the r 2 for each cohort ranged from 0.25 to 0.33, generally consistent with the r 2 from 25(OH)D prediction models derived in other studies. [2830] Though these models explained only a proportion of the variability in 25(OH)D, predicted 25(OH)D has been inversely associated with several chronic diseases including colorectal cancer,[31] renal cell cancer,[32] and type 2 diabetes[29] among others, highlighting the utility of biomarker prediction models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%