2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicted and measured concentrations for selected pharmaceuticals in UK rivers: Implications for risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
62
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been found with a concentration of up to 6 μgL −1 in European sewage effluents (Ternes 1998), up to 10 μgL −1 in US natural waters (Kolpin et al 2002), and more than 65 μgL −1 in Tyne River in the UK (Robert and Thomas 2006 Kolpin et al (2002) detected acetaminophen in roughly 25 % of the samples tested at a median concentration of 0.11 μgL −1 . The median concentration of paracetamol detected in surface waters is 0.055±0.051 μgL −1 (Wiegel et al 2004;Bound and Voulvoulis 2006;Gros et al 2006). In raw wastewater, paracetamol was detected at a median concentration of 48±75 μgL −1 (Han et al 2006;Gomez et al 2007).…”
Section: Paracetamol In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been found with a concentration of up to 6 μgL −1 in European sewage effluents (Ternes 1998), up to 10 μgL −1 in US natural waters (Kolpin et al 2002), and more than 65 μgL −1 in Tyne River in the UK (Robert and Thomas 2006 Kolpin et al (2002) detected acetaminophen in roughly 25 % of the samples tested at a median concentration of 0.11 μgL −1 . The median concentration of paracetamol detected in surface waters is 0.055±0.051 μgL −1 (Wiegel et al 2004;Bound and Voulvoulis 2006;Gros et al 2006). In raw wastewater, paracetamol was detected at a median concentration of 48±75 μgL −1 (Han et al 2006;Gomez et al 2007).…”
Section: Paracetamol In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, in-depth characterization of genes and enzyme systems involved in the utilization of paracetamol has led to an improved understanding of microbial paracetamol metabolism. A large number of (Kolpin et al 2002) (Gros et al 2006) 0.007-0.066 (Wiegel et al 2004) 6 (Ternes 1998) 0.048-0.418 (Radjenovic et al 2007) 10 ( Kolpin et al 2002) 0.079-0.22 (Bound and Voulvoulis 2006) microorganisms belonging to the phyla of eubacteria, yeast, and fungi and also some algae capable of using paracetamol as carbon and energy source have been described. A listing of isolated bacterial strains characterized for the degradation of those paracetamols is presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Biodegradation Of Paracetamol By Pure Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can also be used to assess existing compounds. Bound and Voulvoulis (2006) used the proportion of the population being treated, the dosage, the amount of wastewater generated per day and an estimate of dilution to identify candidate compounds for a study of pharmaceuticals in UK rivers. Stuer-Lauridsen et al (2000) calculated the PEC using the amount of compound used divided into the amount of wastewater generated both per capita diluted into the environment using a default value of 10, and estimating K ow and DT 50 from literature values.…”
Section: Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, predictions based on annual sales of drugs are likely to underestimate the loads of PhACs in the influents of WWTPs. As shown by Bound & Voulvoulis (2006), the accuracy of predicted environmental concentrations is hindered by a shortage of data, both relating to over-thecounter (OTC) sales of drugs and their fate in WWTPs. In their study, the measured environmental concentrations were considerably higher than predicted, suggesting that the areas sampled deviated from the model proposed by the EMEA (2005).…”
Section: Sources and Levels Of Pharmaceuticals And Illicit Drugs In Wmentioning
confidence: 99%