2015
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.2427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicted and Measured Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness From Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared With Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Abstract: IMPORTANCE New methods are needed to compare peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (pRNFLT) measurements taken from time-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) and spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT). OBJECTIVE To compare the agreement of measured and predicted pRNFLT using different equations based on pRNFLT measurements obtained by TD-OCT and SD-OCT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely due to the larger standard deviations of the pRNFL measurements compared to the RNFL measurements. Although this shows that there is substantial spread of pRNFL thickness between subjects, it is known that the reproducibility of pRNFL measurements within the same subject over time is excellent [37][38][39]. Therefore, pRNFL measurements can be valuable for measuring disease progression in individual patients over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is likely due to the larger standard deviations of the pRNFL measurements compared to the RNFL measurements. Although this shows that there is substantial spread of pRNFL thickness between subjects, it is known that the reproducibility of pRNFL measurements within the same subject over time is excellent [37][38][39]. Therefore, pRNFL measurements can be valuable for measuring disease progression in individual patients over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, as different OCT devices (stratus, cirrus, 3D, or Optovue OCT) were used in the studies included in this meta-analysis to measure the RNFL thickness, we cannot ensure the homogeneity of inspection results. Although the prediction of mean pRNFL thickness values by equations derived from time domain OCT and spectral domain OCT can be conducted with high levels of agreement, [31] the mean RNFL in normal patient is around 105.1 (± 9.5) μm [32] and the resolution is of few micrometers depending on the device. When the retina was affected by OSAS, high prediction errors may occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 37 ] In addition, RNFL measured by SD-OCT may be more relevant to migraine than TD-OCT., for the SD-OCT can detect more subtle damage to RNFL. [ 38 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%