2018
DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicted and Observed Responses of a Nonnative Channel Catfish Population Following Managed Removal to Aid the Recovery of Endangered Fishes

Abstract: Human transformation of aquatic systems and the introduction of nonnative species increasingly threaten the persistence of imperiled freshwater fishes. In response, large‐scale mechanical removal of nonnative fishes has been implemented throughout parts of the Colorado River basin to aid recovery of endangered fishes, but the effects of these efforts can be difficult to quantify. Fisheries population models for predicting outcomes of harvest regulations have been widely used to prevent overfishing of commercia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work provides a template for planning of similar efforts to conserve native fish assemblages in the context of social or logistical limitations on the use of chemical piscicides (reviewed in Peterson et al 2008). Despite documented difficulties in achieving positive population-scale responses in native fishes through suppression of invasives, or in teasing apart confounding environmental variation associated with these programs (Coggins et al 2011;Franssen et al 2014;Pennock et al 2018), managers continue to implement mechanical removal of invasive fishes. Annual costs to agencies of streamwide suppression in our study ranged from approximately US$266 000 to $336 000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our work provides a template for planning of similar efforts to conserve native fish assemblages in the context of social or logistical limitations on the use of chemical piscicides (reviewed in Peterson et al 2008). Despite documented difficulties in achieving positive population-scale responses in native fishes through suppression of invasives, or in teasing apart confounding environmental variation associated with these programs (Coggins et al 2011;Franssen et al 2014;Pennock et al 2018), managers continue to implement mechanical removal of invasive fishes. Annual costs to agencies of streamwide suppression in our study ranged from approximately US$266 000 to $336 000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annual costs to agencies of streamwide suppression in our study ranged from approximately US$266 000 to $336 000. While suppression is difficult and costly, improvements in demographic vital rates of native or endangered fishes may be expected when invasive fishes are reduced in density (Peterson et al 2008;Bair et al 2018;Pennock et al 2018). The suppression of invasive predators and competitors in shrinking aquatic habitats may be critical to the preservation or restoration of these unique and imperiled desert native fish assemblages (Williams et al 1985;Mueller 2005;Propst et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Pennock et al. ) and abiotic (e.g., altered flow regime; Propst and Gido ; Gido and Propst ) changes that have modified the quality and availability of habitats in the San Juan River (Franssen et al. ); however, any confounding capture‐induced mortality should similarly be minimized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Pennock et al. ), flow management (Propst and Gido ; Gido and Propst ), and stocking of hatchery‐reared fish (Furr ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%