2019
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2018.10.0698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicted Annual Biomass Input to Maintain Soil Organic Carbon under Contrasting Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Rickman model here exposed is an improvement of the Douglas-Rickman model, and has been extensively used with good results in a wide variety of climates and crops to predict decomposition or to aid in soil carbon modeling [41,43,45,72,73]. The best E values were always obtained for C in all the CCs, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 (Table 8).…”
Section: C N and P Modellingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Rickman model here exposed is an improvement of the Douglas-Rickman model, and has been extensively used with good results in a wide variety of climates and crops to predict decomposition or to aid in soil carbon modeling [41,43,45,72,73]. The best E values were always obtained for C in all the CCs, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 (Table 8).…”
Section: C N and P Modellingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both have proven to be useful to predict residue decomposition under Mediterranean conditions [42,43], as well as in a wide range of climates [44]. These models are currently used alone or as part of more complex soil models [41,45,46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify biomass thresholds for maintaining soil quality, several studies in the U.S. Corn Belt have quantified the C inputs needed in a maize-soybean rotation to sustain SOC. Using simulation models, Huggins et al (1998) and Gollany et al (2019) estimated that 5.6 C ha −1 yr −1 (from aboveground biomass and roots under tillage) or 3.8 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 (aboveground biomass under no-tillage), respectively, was required to sustain SOC in the 0-to 30-cm soil depth. However, the effect of biomass on SOC sequestration and the required C inputs under different rice-based rotations including pasture and annual crops in temperate regions has not been quantified.…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1998) and Gollany et al. (2019) estimated that 5.6 C ha −1 yr −1 (from aboveground biomass and roots under tillage) or 3.8 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 (aboveground biomass under no‐tillage), respectively, was required to sustain SOC in the 0‐ to 30‐cm soil depth. However, the effect of biomass on SOC sequestration and the required C inputs under different rice‐based rotations including pasture and annual crops in temperate regions has not been quantified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It works on a daily time-step and performs long-term (e.g., 100-yr) simulations. It simulates the effects of climate (Gollany, 2016;Gollany et al, 2013), crop rotations (Gollany et al, 2012(Gollany et al, , 2013Liang et al, 2008), amendment additions (Plaza et al, 2012;Rickman et al, 2001), crop residue burning (Gollany et al, 2012;Liang et al, 2009;Rickman et al, 2001) or crop residue removal (Gollany et al, 2010(Gollany et al, , 2011Gollany et al, 2020), and tillage management practices on SOC stocks in a soil profile of up to five layers (Gollany & Elnaggar, 2017;Leite et al, 2009;Liang et al, 2009;Rickman et al, 2002;Wilhelm et al, 2010). Soil organic matter change is computed by maintaining a soil C budget for C additions from atmospheric CO 2 sequestration during photosynthesis or from added amendments, and organic C losses as CO 2 through microbial decomposition (Liang et al, 2009).…”
Section: Description Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%