2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13065-015-0085-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Abraham model solvent coefficients

Abstract: BackgroundThe Abraham general solvation model can be used in a broad set of scenarios involving partitioning and solubility, yet is limited to a set of solvents with measured Abraham coefficients. Here we extend the range of applicability of Abraham’s model by creating open models that can be used to predict the solvent coefficients for all organic solvents.ResultsWe created open random forest models for the solvent coefficients e, s, a, b, and v that had out-of-bag R2 values of 0.31, 0.77, 0.92, 0.47, and 0.6… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, we expect the performance of our model to be better for compounds similar to those in the training set, apart from obvious outliers. However, there was no statistically significant performance differential between the interior and the periphery of the chemical space as has been found previously for other properties we have modeled using similar techniques [ 17 ]. We used the free-to-use DMax Chemistry Assistant Software [ 18 ] to help discover regions of the chemical space where our random forest model performs poorly (and conversely, well).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In general, we expect the performance of our model to be better for compounds similar to those in the training set, apart from obvious outliers. However, there was no statistically significant performance differential between the interior and the periphery of the chemical space as has been found previously for other properties we have modeled using similar techniques [ 17 ]. We used the free-to-use DMax Chemistry Assistant Software [ 18 ] to help discover regions of the chemical space where our random forest model performs poorly (and conversely, well).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Solvent coefficients can be obtained from solubility or chromatographic data, from databases, or can be estimated from group-contribution methods. 23,31,35,36 (ii) Various more theoretical a priori calculation methods can be used to predict Gibbs energies of solvation. They can be divided into two categories: (a) Solvation models considering the solute molecule surrounded by a discrete number of solvent molecules: in this approach, the solvation quantities can be deduced from molecular simulation techniques (molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo) or integral equation theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NaPB-sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8. It should be mentioned that Willauer et al in the study [41] of partitioning of a set of 29 organic compounds in PEG-2000-K 3 PO 4 ATPS described partition behavior of compounds by the so-called linear free energy relationship (LFER) model by Abraham [42][43][44][45]. It was concluded [41] that partitioning of organic compounds in PEGsalt ATPS is governed by the solute size, basicity, and aromaticity or halogenicity.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%