2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67162-8_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Access to Persistent Objects Through Static Code Analysis

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we present a fully-automatic, high-accuracy approach to predict access to persistent objects through static code analysis of object-oriented applications. The most widely-used previous technique uses a simple heuristic to make the predictions while approaches that offer higher accuracy are based on monitoring application execution. These approaches add a non-negligible overhead to the application's execution time and/or consume a considerable amount of memory. By contrast, we demonstra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work reported here extends our previous work [17] in several directions. First, after presenting the theoretical grounds, we present the design and implementation of a complete prefetching system, based on static code analysis, and integrate it into an independent POS.…”
Section: Contributionssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The work reported here extends our previous work [17] in several directions. First, after presenting the theoretical grounds, we present the design and implementation of a complete prefetching system, based on static code analysis, and integrate it into an independent POS.…”
Section: Contributionssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The purpose of this evaluation is to analyse how CAPre reduces application execution time, which is the ultimate goal of our prefetching technique. For other indicators such as the true positive or the false negative rates, we refer the reader to [17], where these metrics were analysed in detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations