2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting acute and long-term mortality in a cohort of pulmonary embolism patients using machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By combining a miniaturized and automatized image-based bioassay and machine learning approaches, we extract individual patient signatures directly reflecting the quantitative and qualitative impact of natalizumab on primary cells from the patients. It reached a prediction power above 70% and presents predictive values of accuracy and F1-score comparable or above those of other studies that applied machine learning methods to predict clinical outcome in other disease settings 36,37 . We anticipate that our workflow could be generalized to the testing of other therapeutic antibodies across multiple clinical indications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…By combining a miniaturized and automatized image-based bioassay and machine learning approaches, we extract individual patient signatures directly reflecting the quantitative and qualitative impact of natalizumab on primary cells from the patients. It reached a prediction power above 70% and presents predictive values of accuracy and F1-score comparable or above those of other studies that applied machine learning methods to predict clinical outcome in other disease settings 36,37 . We anticipate that our workflow could be generalized to the testing of other therapeutic antibodies across multiple clinical indications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…[21] equaled only 0.76, what needed to translate on poorer results of TTE prediction effectiveness of the presented results. Moreover, lower prediction values of PESI are met in retrospective studies and venous thromboembolism registries (AUC 0.64-0.7) and higher in single center surveys, reaching even 0.925 [31][32][33]. These values highly derive from study group populations characteristics and data collection manners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, increasing the amount of training data can enable us to obtain more information and make diverse learning in most cases, as well as increase the chances of achieving better results. Some important studies use 70% or 80% of samples in the training set (46)(47)(48). We randomly assigned 1,434 cases to the sample, with 50% of the cases used as the training set and the rest as the test set, to improve the efficiency of model validation.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%